Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Siddesh S/O Mahesh Tayade And Another vs Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 5743 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5743 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2025

Bombay High Court

Siddesh S/O Mahesh Tayade And Another vs Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation ... on 17 September, 2025

Author: M. S. Jawalkar
Bench: M. S. Jawalkar
2025:BHC-NAG:9328-DB


                                                           1                            wp1608.25.J.odt




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                                      WRIT PETITION NO.1608 OF 2025

                1.      Siddesh s/o Mahesh Tayade
                        Aged about 28 Years,
                        Occupation - Nil
                        R/o, C/o Puja Collection
                        Near Jain Bhavan, Gandhi Chowk,
                        Chandrapur - 442402.

                2.      Smt. Swati wd/o Mahesh Tayade
                        Aged about 52 Years,
                        Occupation - Private (Running Small
                        Cloth and General Store)
                        R/o, C/o Puja Collection
                        Near Jain Bhavan, Gandhi Chowk,
                        Chandrapur - 442402.                ....... PETITIONERS

                                                  ...V E R S U S...

                1.      Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation
                        Through its Commissioner General
                        Administration Department
                        Gandhi Chowk Road, Bazar Ward
                        Chandrapur - 442402.

                2.       State of Maharashtra Through its
                         Secretary, Urban Development
                         Department, Mantralaya,
                         Mumbai 32.                                          ....... RESPONDENTS
                --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Mr. Sachin Khandekar, Advocate for Petitioners.
                         Mr. M. I. Dhatrak, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                         Mr. A. V. Palshikar, AGP for Respondent No.2/State.
                --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                CORAM:           SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
                DATE:            17th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

                ORAL JUDGMENT:                    (PER RAJ D. WAKODE, J.)

2 wp1608.25.J.odt

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by

consent of the learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner before this Court has challenged the

impugned orders dated 02.02.2022 placed at Annexure No.XI,

24.02.2022 placed at Annexure No.XV and 28.06.2022 placed at

Annexure No.XVIII, all orders passed by the respondent No.1

Commissioner, Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation,

Chandrapur. The contention of the petitioner is that Mr. Mahesh

Tayade, the father of the petitioner No.1 and the husband of the

petitioner No.2 was working with the respondent No.1. While in

service Mr. Mahesh Tayade expired on 23.02.2011. At the time of

his death, the petitioner No.1 was a minor and hence his mother

the petitioner No.2 had applied for appointment on compassionate

basis on the place of her husband on 10.03.2011. However, the

petitioner No.2 reached the age of 45 and hence, she applied for

substitution of the name of the petitioner No.2 at her place which

was rejected by the respondent No.1 by virtue of the aforesaid

impugned communication. The aforesaid issue is no more res

integra in view of the judgment of this Court place at record page

No.125 passed in the case of Kalpana wd/o Vilas Taram and

another v. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2024(4) 3 wp1608.25.J.odt

Mh.L.J. (F.B.) 312 which held that the aforesaid substitution is

permissible. In compliance of the aforesaid law settled by the Full

Bench of this Court, we intend to allow the present writ petition.

Mr. Dhatrak, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent

No.1 also fairly conceded the aforesaid position and also has

placed on record the copy of order passed by this Court in Writ

Petition No.8019/2022 which permited such substitution. In view

of the above judgment by this Court, we allow the present petition.

The impugned orders dated 02.02.2022, 24.02.2022 and

28.06.2022 passed by the respondent No.1 Commissioner,

Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation, Chandrapur are hereby

quashed and set aside.

3. We permit the petitioner to appear before the

Additional Municipal Commissioner of respondent No.1

on 30.09.2025.

4. The Additional Municipal Commissioner shall deal

with the claim of the petitioner in the light of the Full Bench

decision of this Court in the matter of Kalpana wd/o Vilas Taram

and another referred supra, as expeditiously as possible, and in

any case, within a period of four weeks, from the date of

appearance.

4 wp1608.25.J.odt

5. Once the petitioner is allowed to be eligible for

employment on compassionate ground, the appointment order

shall be issued to the petitioner, as per seniority.

6. The petition accordingly partly allowed in the

aforesaid terms.

(RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, J.)

NSN

Signed by: Mr. N.S. Nikhare Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 18/09/2025 18:50:43

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter