Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rupam Vinaykumar Juare vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 7464 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7464 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2025

Bombay High Court

Rupam Vinaykumar Juare vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps ... on 13 November, 2025

2025:BHC-NAG:11947-DB


                        J-apl1055.25 final.odt                                         1/7


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR


                                 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) No.1055 OF 2025


                        1.    Rupam Vinaykumar Juare,
                              Aged about 27,
                              Occupation : Service,
                              R/o. Burdi Armori, Tah. Armori,
                              Distt. Gadchiroli.

                        2.    Neha Vinaykumar Juare,
                              Aged about 31,
                              Occupation : Service,
                              R/o. Burdi Armori,
                              Tah. Armori, Distt. Gadchiroli.           :     APPLICANTS

                                 ...VERSUS...

                        1.    The State of Maharashtra,
                              Through Police Station Officer,
                              Police Station Armori,
                              Tah. Armori, Distt. Gadchiroli.

                        2.    Atul Dilip Selote,
                              Aged about 35,
                              Occupation : Police Constable,
                              (Badge No.135), R/o. Armori,
                              Tah. Armori, Distt. Gadchiroli.          :    RESPONDENTS

                        =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                        Mr. Parth Sagdeo, Advocate for Applicants.
                        Mrs. Sneha Dhote, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1.
                        =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

                        CORAM                      :   URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND
                                                       NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.

                        RESERVED ON    :               06th NOVEMBER, 2025.
                        PRONOUNCED ON :                13th NOVEMBER, 2025.
 J-apl1055.25 final.odt                                               2/7


JUDGMENT :

(Per : Nandesh S. Deshpande, J.)

1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally by consent of learned

counsel appearing for the parties.

2. The applicants have approached this Court by filing the

present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of the Final Report

No.25 of 2022, dated 19.04.2022 arising out of First Information

Report No.207/2021, dated 04.07.2021, registered with Police

Station Armori, District Gadchiroli, for the offences punishable

under Section 186 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860.

3. As per the contents of the First Information Report

respondent No.2 lodged a report with respondent No.1 on

04.07.2021, stating that on 21.06.2021, the Tahsildar, Armori had

written a letter to the Police Station informing that the applicants

had threatened to commit suicide, alleging that an illegal case, i.e.

Crime No.155/2021, had been registered against them for offences

punishable under Sections 353, 188, 272, 273 read with Section 34

of the Indian Penal Code. Pursuant thereto, on 28.06.2021, the

father of the applicants was called to the Police Station and was

directed to send the applicants for counselling. Upon their

appearance, the concerned officer of the Armori Police Station

attempted to counsel and dissuade them from taking any extreme

steps and, as a preventive measure, issued a notice under Section

149 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicants were

again summoned on 29.06.2021 and 30.06.2021 by the Police

Officials for further counselling and were once more advised not to

commit suicide. Subsequently, on 02.07.2021, the Sub-Divisional

Police Officer, Armori visited the Police Station for conciliation with

the applicants, however, they failed to appear despite due

intimation.

4. On 03.07.2021, in view of the repeated threats by the

applicants to commit suicide, preventive security measures were

ordered at the Office of the Tahsildar, Armori. At about 04:10 pm,

the mother and sister of the applicants arrived at the said office,

and shortly thereafter, at approximately 04:20 pm, a white Hyundai

i-10 car bearing registration number MH-33-V-1966 reached the

premises. Upon inquiry, the father of the applicants pointed

towards the back seat of the vehicle, stating that the applicants had

consumed pills at about 4:30 pm. Based on the said medical

findings and the prior threats made by the applicants to commit

suicide, the Police registered an offence against them for the

commission of offences punishable under Sections 309, 186, and 34

of the Indian Penal Code. It is this First Information Report and the

consequent Final Report which is being assailed in the present

application.

5. We have heard Mr. Parth Sagdev, learned counsel for

the applicants and Mrs. Sneha Dhote, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor for the respondent No.1.

6. The Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that a

criminal case vide Crime no. 15 of 2021 under Sections 353, 188,

272,273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the

applicants because of which the applicants on 03.07.2021

consumed pills of Avil-50 which subsequently resulted an overdose

of "pheniramine malate". Therefore, as the applicants had

intimidated about committing suicide and tried to commit the same

by overdosing themselves with "pheniramine malate" a First

Information Report dated 04.07.2021 was registered against them

under Sections 309, 186 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

However, offence under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code was

dropped as there was no evidence available on record to support

the allegations and make out materials of Section 309 of the Indian

Penal Code.

7. The learned counsel for applicants submitted that an

offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code could not have

been registered at all against the present Applicant. Section 195 of

the Criminla Procedure Code expressly bars the Court from taking

cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 186 of the

Indian Penal Code based on a police report cognizance for such an

offence can only be taken upon a written complaint made by the

concerned public servant or by a public servant to whom he is

subordinate. In the present case, no such complaint has been filed

as required under Section 195(1)(a) read with Section 190(1)(a) of

the Criminal Procedure Code. Therefore, registration and

continuation of proceedings under Section 186 of the Indian Penal

Code are without jurisdiction.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Additional Public

Prosecutor vehemently opposed the submissions advanced by the

Counsel for the Applicants. The Learned Additional Public

Prosecutor submits that investigating agency has collected the

ample material showing the prima-facie involvement of the present

applicants along with other accused persons in commission of crime

and in view of the above, fair opportunity needs to be given to the

prosecution to prove their case by conducting the full-fledged trial.

9. In the backdrop of these submissions we have perused

the First Information Report and the consequent charge-sheet the

only offence which now remains punishable under Section 186 of

the Indian Penal Code. Said Section speaks about obstructing

public servant in discharge of public functions and contemplates

that whoever voluntary obstruct any public servant in discharge of

public functions shall be punishable with imprisonment as provided

under said Section. However, Section 195 of the Criminal

Procedure Code specifically bars the trial Court from taking

cognizance of offence punishable under the said Section except on

the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some

other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate.

10. In the present case as can be seen from the First

Information Report the same has been lodged by one Atul Dilip

Selote, who happens to be a Police Personnel. It is, therefore, clear

that the Court is barred from taking cognizance in view of specific

bar under Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The

resultant prosecution, therefore, would be an abuse of process of

Court and, therefore, the situation would squarely falls within the

parameters of judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, in the case of

State of Haryana and others Vs. Bhajanlal and others, reported in

1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, Para No.102, sub-para (6) observed as

under :

(6) Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act (under which a criminal

proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the Code or the concerned Act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party."

11. We, therefore, pass the following order :

ORDER

(i) The application is allowed.

(ii) Final Report No.25 of 2022, dated 19.04.2022

arising out of First Information Report No.207/2021, dated

04.07.2021, registered with Police Station Armori, District

Gadchiroli, for the offences punishable under Section 186 read with

Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is quashed and set aside.

(iii) The application is disposed of.

(Nandesh S. Deshpande, J.) (Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J.)

wadode

Signed by: Mr. Devendra Wadode Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 13/11/2025 14:54:16

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter