Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pearl Marie Mascarenhas And Anr vs State Of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 155 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 155 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025

Bombay High Court

Pearl Marie Mascarenhas And Anr vs State Of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary ... on 6 May, 2025

2025:BHC-GOA:855                                 905-WP-193-25.DOC
2025:BHC-GOA:855




                   Suchitra



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

                                         WRIT PETITION NO.193/2025


                    PEARL MARIE
                    MASCARENHAS AND ANR                                   ... PETITIONER

                          Versus

                    STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS
                    CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3                                 ... RESPONDENTS
                    ORS.


                    Mr Shivraj Gaonkar with Mr P. Sirvoicar, Advocates for the
                    Petitioner.

                    Ms S. Mordekar, AGA for Respondents No.1 to 3.
                    Mr Jonathan George, Advocate for Respondent No.4.


                                       CORAM:             VALMIKI MENEZES, J.

                                       DATED:             6th MAY 2025


                    ORAL JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Rule. he rule is made returnable forthwith at the request and with the consent of the parties.

3. he challenge in this petition is to an order dated 23.04.2025 of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies

6th May 2025

905-WP-193-25.DOC

exercising powers under Section 67A of the Goa Cooperative Societies Act (the Act). By this order the Registrar has appointed respondent no.4 as an administrator of the society. he society is a tenant co-partnership society of which shares are allotted to its members. he cause for appointing an administrator was an earlier order by which the Board of Directors of the society stood disqualiied. In order to appoint an administrator, to administer the daily afairs of the society until fresh elections are called for, appointment letter is issued.

4. In terms of the powers vested in the Registrar under Section 67A, a notice dated 09.12.2024 was issued calling upon the members of the society to volunteer their names for appointment of administrator of the society, until fresh elections are called for. Amongst the persons who volunteered to act as administrator, various members communicated their willingness through three letters, the irst dated 07.04.2025 and the other two dated 08.04.2025. In addition, respondent no.4 also put in his willingness to act as an administrator by his letter dated 25.03.2025. It is an admitted position that the respondent no.4 owns a lat in the society and has applied for membership, however, no resolution is yet passed granting him membership or allotting shares to him in the society. It is not in dispute that the other names/members who have volunteered to be on the panel of administrators are members of the society.

5. he Registrar normally appoints a panel of administrators comprising of three members of the society or any three persons who, in terms of Section 67A would be competent to administer

6th May 2025

905-WP-193-25.DOC

the afairs of the society until elections are held. In the present case, the Registrar has chosen to appoint respondent no.4 over all other volunteering members, as a sole administrator without assigning any reasons whatsoever in the impugned order for choosing a non-member over members. his does not mean that Section 67A does not permit such a course of appointing a non- member.

6. However, given the circumstances that there were at least four members who had volunteered to act as administrators, who obviously would be more familiar with the running of the society, the Registrar has chosen, without assigning any reasons, to appoint a sole administrator from the non-members which is against the norm followed to appoint administrator. he order was totally arbitrary, passed without application of mind and in complete non-consideration of the applications made before the Registrar whilst appointing respondent no.4.

7. In that view of the matter, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. he Registrar shall consider all the names of the volunteers placed before him under the letters referred to in the impugned order as also the objections dated 15.04.2025 iled by the petitioners and pass a fresh order after applying his mind to all the aforementioned facts. he order shall be passed within two weeks from today. he Registrar may also apply his mind as to the time frames within which the election process for a new committee for the society should take place since the society has more than two hundred apartments/and likely as many members.

6th May 2025

905-WP-193-25.DOC

8. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.

9. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

VALMIKI MENEZES, J.

6th May 2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter