Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Reliance General Insurance Company ... vs Smt. Dipti Nitin Sankpal And Ors.
2025 Latest Caselaw 761 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 761 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 July, 2025

Bombay High Court

Reliance General Insurance Company ... vs Smt. Dipti Nitin Sankpal And Ors. on 23 July, 2025

Author: Shivkumar Dige
Bench: Shivkumar Dige
2025:BHC-AS:32351

          S.S.Kilaje                                                   25-FA-619-2024 -Judgment (C).doc

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                   FIRST APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2024

                           Reliance General Insurance Company Limited                    ... Appellant
                           Through its Manager Legal Mr. Priyank Shah
                           4th Floor, Chintamani Avenue,
                           Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon-East,
                           Mumbai
                                       Versus
                       1   Dipti Nitin Sankpal
                           Aged about 33 years
                           Widow of the deceased
                       2   Savita Shankar Sankpal
                           Aged about 60 years
                           Mother of the deceased
                       3   Srushti Nitin Sankpal
                           Age about 8 years, Daughter of the deceased
                       4   Dhruv Nitin Sankpal
                           Age about 3 years
                           Son of the deceased

                           Sine the Applicant Nos. 3 and 4 are minor,
                           Through their mother and next friend
                           Smt. Dipti Nitin Sankpal
                           All Residing at : Shivshakti Park
                           503-504, 5th Floor, N.M.Joshi Marg,
                           Mumbai - 400 011
                       5   Tanaji Mahadev Wanmane                                         ... Respondents
                           At Mahape, Post Ghansoli
                           Navi Mumbai - 400 707

                                                            .............

                       Mr. Rahul Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture, Advocate for the Appellant.
                       Mr. S.R.Gupta, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.




                                                                                                    1/4



                        ::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2025                    ::: Downloaded on - 02/08/2025 07:38:26 :::
 S.S.Kilaje                                                  25-FA-619-2024 -Judgment (C).doc

                                              CORAM       : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                              DATED       : 23rd JULY, 2025.

             ORAL JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is preferred by the Appellant / Insurance Company

against the Judgment and Order passed by the Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Mumbai (for short "the Tribunal").

2. It is contention of learned counsel for the appellant / Insurance

Company that the Tribunal has awarded 50% future prospects. At the time

of accident, the deceased was in service and he was 40 years old. Future

prospects should be 30% and consortium amount is awarded on higher

side, hence requested to allow the appeal.

3. It is contention of learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to

4/claimants that the Tribunal has passed well reasoned order. No

interference is required in it and requested to dismiss the appeal.

4. I have heard both the learned counsel. Perused Judgment and order

passed by the Tribunal. At the time of accident, the deceased was 40 years

old and he was in service. The Tribunal has awarded 50% future prospects.

As per the view of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of National Insurance

Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi, 2017 ACJ 2700(SC) , the claimants are entitled

for 30% future prospects as the deceased was not a permanent employee.

The Tribunal has awarded consortium on higher side. As per the

view of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Magma General Insurance

S.S.Kilaje 25-FA-619-2024 -Judgment (C).doc

Co. Ltd. vs. Nanu Ram, 2018 ACJ 2782 (SC) , each claimant is entitled to

Rs.48,000/- as consortium amount, Rs.18,000/- as a funeral expenses,

Rs.18,000/- for loss of estate.

5. Considering the above calculation, the claimants are entitled for

following compensation:

                                   Particulars                Rs.            Amount
             Income                                           Rs.           35,500/-
             30% Future Prospects                             Rs.           46,150/-
             Total Rs. 46,150 X ¼ Deduction X 15 Rs.                      62,30,250/-
             (multiplier) X 12
             Consortium (48,000 X 4)                          Rs.          1,92,000/-
             Loss of Estate                                   Rs.           18,000/-
             Funeral Expenses                                 Rs.           18,000/-
             Total                                            Rs.         64,58,250/-
             Compensation awarded by Tribunal                 Rs.         74,38,750/-
             Refunded to Insurer                              Rs.          9,80,500/-


The Tribunal has awarded Rs.74,38,700/- as compensation, if this

amount deducts from the compensation amount considered by this Court,

it comes to Rs.9,80,500/-. This is excess amount.

6. In view of the above, I pass following order:

ORDER

i. The appeal is allowed.

ii. The appellant/Insurance company is permitted to

withdraw Rs.9,80,500/- along with proportionate

S.S.Kilaje 25-FA-619-2024 -Judgment (C).doc

interest.

iii. The claimants are permitted to withdraw balance amount

along with proportionate interest.

iv. The statutory amount along with interest be transmitted

to the Tribunal. The parties are at liberty to withdraw it

as per Rule.

                                             v.     R & P be sent back to the Tribunal.

                             7.     The appeal is disposed of.          All pending applications, if any also

                             disposed of.



SONALI by


       SATISH KILAJE
SATISH Date:
                                                                               ( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
       2025.07.31
KILAJE 11:23:52
       +0700









 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter