Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Rayshi Satra vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 686 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 686 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2025

Bombay High Court

Vinod Rayshi Satra vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 22 July, 2025

Author: A. S. Gadkari
Bench: A. S. Gadkari
    2025:BHC-AS:31198-DB

                             KVM                                                                    50 - APL 560-25.doc




                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          Digitally signed
          by KANCHAN
KANCHAN   VINOD
VINOD     MAYEKAR
MAYEKAR   Date:
          2025.07.25
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
          15:16:38 +0530



                                                   CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 560 OF 2025

                                    Vinod Rayshi Satra                  ]
                                    Age: 47 years, Occu: Business       ]
                                    Resident at 105, Akruti Park,       ]
                                    Dhobi Ali, Opposite Civil Hospital, ]
                                    Tembi Naka, Thane West - 400 601. ]                    ...Applicant
                                                                                           (Org. Accused)
                                             Vs.

                             1.     The State of Maharashtra                 ]
                                    (At the instance of Naupada              ]
                                    Police Station, Dist. Thane              ]

                             2.     Virji Kanji Dhadhi                    ]
                                    Age: 40 years, Occu: Business,        ]
                                    Partner of M/s. Continental Maniratna ]
                                    Builders and Developers having office]
                                    At Shop No. 3, Ratnamani Apartment,]
                                    Dada Patil Wadi Near Platform No.1, ]
                                    Thane (W) 400602                      ]                ...Respondents

                                                        _______________________________
                             Mr. Govind Solanke for Applicant.
                             Mr. Ajay S. Patil for Respondent No.1-State.
                             Ms. Sonam More for Respondent No.2.
                             Mr. Ravindra Ranbhise, Police Sub-Inspector, Naupada Police Station, Thane
                             present.
                                                   _______________________________

                                                                  CORAM :    A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                             RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

                                                                  DATE   :   22nd July, 2025




                                                                                                                   1/4



                                   ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2025                   ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2025 10:07:49 :::
 KVM                                                                     50 - APL 560-25.doc


JUDGMENT (Per : Rajesh S. Patil, J.):

-

1) Applicant, accused in C.R. No. 215 of 2023 dated 20th July

2023, registered with Naupada Police Station, Thane, under Sections 420,

467 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 have filed present Application

under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of the said

C.R. and all further proceedings arising thereof, with the consent of

Respondent No.2, the informant.

2) Learned Advocate for Applicant submitted that, the Applicant

and Respondent No.2 have settled their disputes and differences amicably.

He therefore submitted that, the said case may be quashed with the consent

of Respondent No.2.

3) Learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 has tendered across the

Bar, his Affidavit dated 8th May 2025, duly affirmed before a Notary Public.

In Paragraph No. 7 thereof, the Respondent No.2 has given his No Objection

for quashing of the said crime.

3.1) Respondent No.2 is personally present in the Court and

through his Advocate reiterates the contents of his Affidavit dated 8 th May,

2025 and his 'No Objection' for quashing of the crime in question.

4) In view thereof, we are inclined to quash the FIR arising out of

C.R. No. 215 of 2023 dated 20th July 2023, registered with Naupada Police

Station, Thane.


5)               As we expressed our opinion for quashing of FIR arising out of






 KVM                                                                     50 - APL 560-25.doc


C.R. No. 215 of 2023 dated 20th July 2023, registered with Naupada Police

Station, Thane, learned Advocate for Applicant on instructions submitted

that, the Applicant will pay a cost of Rs.25,000/- to the Bar Council of

Maharashtra and Goa's Advocate Academy & Research Center, within a

period of two weeks from the date of uploading of present Judgment on the

official website of High Court of Bombay. The said statement is accepted as

an undertaking given to this Court.

6) We therefore direct the Applicant to pay a cost of Rs.25,000/-

to the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa's Advocate Academy & Research

Center, within a period of two weeks from the date of uploading of present

Judgment on the official website of High Court of Bombay.

6.1) Details of the bank account of payment of cost are as under :-

                  Account Name    : BCMG'S Advocate Academy                    &
                                    Research Center.
                  Account Number : 000120110001327
                  Bank Name       : Bank of India
                  Branch Name     : Mumbai Main Branch
                  IFS Code        : BKID0000001
                  Type of Account : Current Account



6.2)             Applicant to deposit the said cost within stipulated period as

noted above and submit receipt(s) of the same in the Registry of this Court.

7) In view of the above and subject to payment of cost by the

Applicant, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

 KVM                                                                           50 - APL 560-25.doc


8)              It is made clear that, if the cost is not paid within stipulated

period     as    mentioned           above,   the   Application   shall stand          revived

automatically and in that event, the trial Court will proceed with the said

case expeditiously.

9) List the Application on board on 12 th August 2025, under

caption 'For Reporting Compliance' of present Judgment.

      (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)                                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)









 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter