Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hitesh Sunil Dhote vs Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 1100 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1100 Bom
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2025

Bombay High Court

Hitesh Sunil Dhote vs Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, ... on 31 July, 2025

Author: M.S. Jawalkar
Bench: M.S. Jawalkar
2025:BHC-NAG:90


                  J wp 7427-2024.odt                                                           1/5




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR


                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 7427 OF 2024

                          Hitesh S/o Sunil Dhote,
                          Aged about 27 years, Occ : nil,
                          R/o Wandali Wagh, Post Katol,
                          District Nagpur
                                                                                   ....PETITIONER

                         ....VERSUS....

                  1.      Union of India, through its
                          Secretary, Ministry of Home
                          Affairs New Delhi

                  2.      Director General of Central
                          Reserve Police Force(CRPF)
                          (Recruitment branch), East
                          Block-07, Level-04, Sector-01,
                          R.K. Puram, New Delhi-66)

                  3.      Staff Selection Commission,
                          Through its Chairman,
                          Northern Region Block No. 12,
                          CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New
                          Delhi - 110003

                  4.      Review Medical Board, CH
                          Nagpur, (Recruitment) CT/GD
                          Group Centre, Central Reserve
                          Police Force, Nagpur
                                                                                ....RESPONDENTS

                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Shri K.N. Jain, Advocate for petitioner
                  Shri C.J. Dhumne, Advocate for respondent No.1, 2 & 4
                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 J wp 7427-2024.odt                                         2/5


                CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND
                        SHRI. PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ..
                DATED : 31/07/2025


ORAL JUDGMENT(PER SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.)
(1)     Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

(2)     Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4.

(3)     In the present petition, the petitioner is seeking direction

against the respondents/Authorities to consider his candidature to

the post of Constable (GD) in Central Armed Police Forces

(CAPFs), as the petitioner has been arbitrarily and illegally

declared unfit by Review Medical Examination Board at Central

Reserve Police Force, Centre Nagpur on 16/10/2024, for having

Congenital Melanocytic Nevus (CMN) (Birth marks) and scars of

tattoo removal on right forearm, by its report dated 16/10/2024.

(4) In pursuance of the advertisement dated 24/11/2023, for the

post of Constable, he applied for the Constable post in the OBC

category as he has satisfied the conditions, his form was accepted.

He had cleared the written test and appeared for the Physical

Standard Test (PST). The petitioner was declared unfit by the

Medical Officer, Medical Examination Board, for having a tattoo

scar on the right forearm and hyper pigmented patch over the left

forearm. It is his contention that the Congenital Melanolytic Nevus

is nothing but a birthmark. He filed his representation on

26/10/2024 with the respondent No.2, along with judgments of

this Court. Petitioner submitted that he is otherwise absolutely fit,

and the said tattoo or patch does not affect his efficiency in

performing the duties.

(5) Learned Counsel for the respondent submitted their reply

and supported the order.

(6) In Writ Petition 7027/2024, relied on by the petitioner, there

is reference to the petitions, wherein, such an issue is dealt with

and it is held that though policy permits disqualification on this

ground speaks that anomaly, should be of such a nature which

would interfere with the functioning. Those are reproduced

below :

 Sr. No.          Case No.                    Name of Parties                  Decided on
      1.    WP No. 5273 of 2024    Nikhil Ishwar Karde vs. Union of India    11.12.2024

2. WP. No.10026 of 2017 Shridhar M. Pakhare vs. Union of India. 30.01.2018

3. WP. No.1991 of 2019 Hardik Rameshkumar Waghela Vs. Union 21.02.2019 of India

4. WP. No. 1637 of 2024 Saurabh S. Junghare Vs. Union of India 16.07.2024

5. WP. (MD) No. 16282 K.M. Manojkumar Vs. The Secretary, 01.04.2021 of 2020 S.S.C. & others

6. C.W.P. No. 361 of 2021 Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India 24.11.2023

(7) On perusal of the guideline in paragraph No. 11 under the

caption Miscellaneous Conditions, Guideline No. 3, speaks about

the tattoo. It is informed by the petitioner that the said tattoo was

removed and there is only a scar. In view of this statement, which

is admitted by the learned Counsel for the respondent there is no

impediment in allowing the petition and accepting the

candidature of the petitioner for the post of Constable, according

to merit. Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following order :

ORDER

i) The Writ Petition is allowed.

ii) The impugned Medical Examination Report dated

14/10/2024, and Review of Medical Examination Report dated

16/10/2024, that declares the petitioner unfit, is hereby quashed

and set aside.

iii) The respondent Nos 2 to 4 are hereby directed to consider

the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Constable in

CAPF.(Central Armed Police Force), as per his merit.

iv) It is declared that for the post of Constable in CAPF he is not

to be declared as ineligible on account of tattoo removal mark on

his forearm or for birth mark on forearm.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.)

Jayashree..

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter