Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunanda Shankar Jadhav And Ors. vs Arun Sukdeo Kapadnis And Ors.
2025 Latest Caselaw 2024 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2024 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2025

Bombay High Court

Sunanda Shankar Jadhav And Ors. vs Arun Sukdeo Kapadnis And Ors. on 7 August, 2025

Author: Shivkumar Dige
Bench: Shivkumar Dige
    2025:BHC-AS:35166

                      Shubhada S Kadam                             903-FA-2114-2006-Judgment.doc

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                               FIRST APPEAL NO. 2114 OF 2006
                        1 Smt. Sunanda Shankar Jadhav
                          Age : 32, Occ. Housewife
                        2 Kumar Suresh Shankar Jadhav
                          Age 14, Occ. Education
                        3 Miss Ratna Shankar Jadhav
                          Age 12, Occ. Education
                        4 Miss Suvarna Shankar Jadhav
                          Age 10, Occ. Education
                        5 Miss. Jaya Shankar Jadhav
                          Age 8, Occ. Education
                        6 Kumar Kailas Shankar Jadhav
                          Age 5, Occ. Nil
                        7 Mr. Vishwanath Namdeo Jadhav
                          Age 69, Occ. Labour
                        8 Mrs.Bhimabai Vishwanath Jadhav
                          Age 64, Occ. Labour

                            Nos. 2 to 6 being minors through their natural
                            guardian mother No.1
                            All are residents of : Pimpalgaon
                            Chhabadi, Taluka Chandwad, District- Nashik ... Appellants
                            Versus
                        1 Mr. Arun Sukdeo Kapadnis
                          Major, Occ. Driver
                          R/o. Virgaon, Taluka Satana, District- Nashik
                        2 Mr. Eknath Shivaram Jondhale
                          Major, Occ. Transport,
                          R/o. Shirod, Post Adgaon, Taluka Chandwad,
                          District - Nashik
                        3 The Manager,
                          The National Insurance Co. Ltd.
                          Bytoo Chowk, Nashik-Raod, District - Nashik ... Respondents

SHUBHADA              Mr. Sachin Kadam, Advocate for the Appellants.
SHANKAR               Mr. Sharad Bhosale i/b. Mr. Dilip Bodke, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
KADAM                 Ms. Urmila Sanil, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA                                                 CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2025.08.14
                                                         DATE : 7th AUGUST, 2025.
12:56:35 +0530



                                                                                                1/4



                       ::: Uploaded on - 14/08/2025                 ::: Downloaded on - 15/08/2025 22:51:52 :::
 Shubhada S Kadam                                      903-FA-2114-2006-Judgment.doc

Judgment :

1.            By     this       appeal,   the   appellants/claimants        are     seeking

enhancement of compensation.

2.            It is contention of learned counsel for the appellants that the

Tribunal has not awarded future prospects, wrong multiplier is applied and

consortium amount is awarded on lower side.

3.            It is contention of learned counsel for Respondent No.3-

Insurance Company that the Tribunal has passed well reasoned order, no

interference is required in it and requested to dismiss the appeal.

4.            Learned           counsel   for   respondent    No.2       submitted        that

appropriate order be passed.

5.            I have heard all learned counsel, perused the judgment and

order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nashik (for short

"the Tribunal").

6.            While awarding compensation, the Tribunal has not awarded

future prospects. As per the view of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. reported in

(2017) 16 SCC 680, the claimants are entitled for 40% future prospects.

7.            The Tribunal has applied multiplier of 15. At the time of the

accident, the age of the deceased was 32 years. Hence, proper multiplier

is 16 and I am considering it.

8.            The Tribunal has not awarded consortium amount. As per the

view of Hon'ble Apex Court in Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.


                                                                                   2/4



 ::: Uploaded on - 14/08/2025                          ::: Downloaded on - 15/08/2025 22:51:52 :::
 Shubhada S Kadam                                  903-FA-2114-2006-Judgment.doc

Nanu Ram, 2018 ACJ 2782 (SC), each claimant is entitled to Rs.48000/-

as consortium amount, Rs.18,000/- for loss of estate and Rs.18000/- for

funeral expenses.

9.            Considering the above calculations, the claimants are entitled

for following compensation :

                                Particulars               Rs.         Amount
         Annual Income (Rs.5000/- x 12)                   Rs.            60,000.00
         40% future prospects                             Rs.            24,000.00
         Total                                            Rs.            84,000.00
         1/3rd deduction towards personal                 Rs.            28,000.00
         expenses
         Total                                            Rs.            56,000.00
         Rs.56,000/- x 16(multiplier)                     Rs.         8,96,000.00
         Consortium (Rs.48,000/- x 8 (claimants)          Rs.         3,84,000.00
         Funeral Expenses                                 Rs.            18,000.00
         Loss of Estate                                   Rs.            18,000.00
         Total Compensation                               Rs.        13,16,000.00


              The Tribunal has awarded Rs.64,500/-, if this amount is

deducted from the amount of Rs.13,16,000/- considered by this Court, it

comes to Rs.12,51,500/-. The claimants are entitled for this amount.

10.           In view of above, I pass the following order :

                                         ORDER
      (1)     The appeal is allowed.

      (2)     The claimants are entitled for enhanced compensation of

Rs.12,51,500/- @ 7.5% interest per annum from the date

of filing claim petition till realisation of the amount. Out of

Shubhada S Kadam 903-FA-2114-2006-Judgment.doc

this amount, Rs.4,20,000/- is consortium amount, the

claimants are entitled @ 7.5% interest per annum on this

amount from 1st November 2017 till realisation of the

amount.

(3) Respondent No.3-Insurance Company shall deposit the

enhanced amount along with accrued interest thereon

within eight weeks from the receipt of this order.

(4) The claimants are permitted to withdraw the enhanced

amount along with accrued interest thereon.

(5) The claimants shall pay deficit court fees on enhanced

amount, if any, as per Rule.

(6) Record and Proceedings be sent back to the Tribunal.

8. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter