Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25409 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2024
2024:BHC-NAG:9991
1 53.WP.7888-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 7888 OF 2023
( The Akola Janata Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd., Akola, Thr. Its
Branch Manager/Authorized Officer
Vs.
District Magistrate (Collector), Wardha & Ors. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders
of Coram, Appearances, Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders
Mr. R.L. Khapre, Senior Advocate a/b Mr. Mandar R. Deshpande, Advocate for
the Petitioner.
Mr. M.J. Khan, AGP for the Respondent No.1/State.
Mr. S.N. Mahajan, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND
SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
DATED : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2024
Heard.
2. On 14.08.2024, the following position was recorded:
"The only question raised is whether the learned District Magistrate, acting under Section 14 of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, "SARFAESI Act") has any power to adjudicate in the instant matter by exercising powers under Section 37A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 as he has refused to exercise jurisdiction under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.
2. Mr. Khapre, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner by relying upon para 18 of the judgment in the case of Balkrishna Rama Tarle Vs. Phoenix ARC Private Ltd. [(2023) 1 SCC 662] submits that powers of the 2 53.WP.7888-2023.odt
District Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act are ministerial in nature and he does not possess any adjudicatory power, on account of which the impugned order cannot sustain."
3. Today Mr. Khan, learned AGP for the Respondent No.1/State, seeks time. He however fairly submits, that on the merits of the matter, the District Magistrate acting under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, does not have any power of adjudication even in exercise of powers under Section 37-A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 as that is not permissible in law. In that view of the matter, which according to us, is a correct position of law, the order dated 13.12.2022 (page 117), which rejects the application filed by the Petitioner/Bank, is hereby quashed and set aside and the matter is remitted back to the District Magistrate to act in terms of and within the four corners of Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.
4. The Petition is allowed in the above terms. No costs.
5. Pending application/s, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.
(SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) SD. Bhimte
Signed by: Mr.S.D.Bhimte Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 05/09/2024 15:12:25
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!