Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Onkar Ramchandra Athawale Prop. Of M/S. ... vs Awade Industries Private Limited And ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 673 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 673 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Onkar Ramchandra Athawale Prop. Of M/S. ... vs Awade Industries Private Limited And ... on 11 January, 2024

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                                                                                           5-REVN-41-2022.doc




                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2022
                                                           WITH
                                        CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2022
                                                           WITH
                                        CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2022
                                                           WITH
                                        CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2022
                                                           WITH
                                        CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2022

                              Onkar Ramchandra Athawale
                              Prop. of M/s. Bhima Colour Cartoons                  ...Applicant
                                    Versus
                              Awade Industries Private Limited And Anr.            ...Respondents
                                                                ....
                              Mr. Vivek Patil i/by Mr. Siddheshwar Biradar, Advocate for the
                              Applicant.
                              Mr. Prajakt Arjunwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                              Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for Respondent-State.

                                                                   ....
                                                               CORAM       : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                                               DATE        : 11th JANUARY, 2024.
          Digitally signed

SUNNY
          by SUNNY
          ANKUSHRAO
ANKUSHRAO THOTE
                              P.C.:
THOTE     Date:
          2024.01.15
          14:56:23 +0530


                              1.             The Revision Applicant in all these applications has

                              challenged the impugned Judgment passed by the trial Court

                              convicting the Applicant for offence under Section 138 of

                              Negotiable Instruments Act and the Appellate Court confirming the

                              conviction. The trial Court while convicting the Applicant had

                              sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for six months and to


                              Sunny Thote                        1 of 4




                             ::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2024                  ::: Downloaded on - 30/01/2024 08:25:51 :::
                                                                    5-REVN-41-2022.doc




 pay compensation. The quantum of compensation was different in

 each case. the learned Sessions Judge partly allowed the appeal.

 The substantive sentence of imprisonment for six months was

 confirmed however, the sentence of payment of compensation and

 imprisonment in default of payment was set aside.

 2.            The Order passed by the Appellate Court indicate that

 the witness of the complainant had admitted in the cross-

 examination for the amount of cheque the complainant instituted

 suit bearing no.19 of 2014 and it was decreed. Once the suit is

 decreed the complainant can recover the amount of decree by

 instituting the executing proceedings. He cannot further claim

 compensation          regarding   the    same    transaction      in    criminal

 proceeding. Decree in the suit for recovery of the amount to the

 suit as well as awarding compensation in criminal proceedings for

 the same transaction would be an unjust enrichment of the

 complainant.

 3.            Apparently, the Orders setting aside the compensation is

 not challenged by the complainant and the decree passed in the

 civil suit is also not challenged by Accused before the Higher Court.

 The contention of the Applicant in all these applications is that the

 case relates to delivery of craft papers. The purchase Orders and



 Sunny Thote                             2 of 4




::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2024                       ::: Downloaded on - 30/01/2024 08:25:51 :::
                                                                 5-REVN-41-2022.doc




 tax invoices does not match as dispute about the delivery of goods.

 4.            There are serious discrepancies in evidence.

 5.            Learned counsel for the complainant however submitted

 that the Applicant had urged various defences. All the defences

 were rejected by both the Courts. All the requisite ingredients to

 constitute the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments

 Act were established. The findings of the trial Court does not

 require any interference. Goods were delivered. If the Accused had

 any dispute about the nature of goods, the goods could have been

 returned to the complainant. The liability is proved. There is

 concurrent finding of the Court and hence the revisions may be

 dismissed.

 6.            It is pertinent to note that the revision applications now

 pertains to challenge to substantive sentence           of imprisonment

 awarded by the Courts below extent of six months imprisonment,

 as the compensation part has been set aside by the Appellate Court.

 Issues raised by the parties required to be adjudicated. Hence, I

 pass the following order;


                                   ORDER
        i.     Rule.



 Sunny Thote                         3 of 4





                                                                 5-REVN-41-2022.doc




        ii.    Interim relief granted by this Court shall continue till

final disposal of the Revision Applications.

iii. Hearing of the Revision Applications are expedited.




                                                (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)




 Sunny Thote                         4 of 4





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter