Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 49 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024
2024:BHC-AS:126
23.COMAOST.18619.2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.18619 OF 2023
ALONG WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15602 OF 2023
IN
COMMERCIAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.18619 OF 2023
ALONG WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.18622 OF 2023
IN
COMMERCIAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.18619 OF 2023
M/s. ABC Digital Cables Private Limited ....Appellant/Applicant
Versus
M/s. Shakun Gases Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr. Ashok Saraogi, Advocate for Appellant/Applicant.
Mr. Girish Kedia a/w. Mr. Krushang Kedia, Advocates for
Respondent.
CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA &
SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 02, 2024
P. C.
1. Mentioned. With the consent of parties, taken out of turn.
2. The above Commercial Appeal inter-alia challenges the order
passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, Borivali Division at Dindoshi,
JANUARY 2, 2024 Aarti Palkar
23.COMAOST.18619.2023.doc
Goregaon, Mumbai dated 10th April, 2023. By the impugned order,
the application filed by the Appellant for rejection of the plaint under
Order VII Rule 11(d) was dismissed by the Lower Court. It is to
impugn this order that the present Appeal is filed.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent
took a preliminary objection, namely, that the above Appeal is not
maintainable under the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act,
2015. In this regard, he brought to our attention a decision of a
Division Bench of this Court in the case of Bank of India & Anr. Vs.
M/s. Maruti Civil Works [Appeal From Order No.362 of 2021 in
Commercial Suit No.6 of 2019, decided on 15 th December, 2023]. He
submitted that in the aforesaid decision, a Division Bench of this
Court has clearly held that an appeal under Section 13(1A) of the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 would lie only against the judgment
and/or orders which are enumerated or enlisted under Order XLIII
of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. An order rejecting an
Application moved under Order VII Rule 10 or Order VII Rule 11(d)
of the CPC is not enumarated or enlisted in Order XLIII of the CPC.
Hence, such an order is not appealable.
4. Faced with this decision, Mr. Saraogi, the learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the Appellant, sought leave to withdraw the
JANUARY 2, 2024 Aarti Palkar
23.COMAOST.18619.2023.doc
above Appeal. In these circumstances, the above Appeal is dismissed
as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
5. We make it clear that the withdrawal of this Appeal will not
disentitle the Appellant to challenge the impugned order in
appropriate proceedings if he is so entitled to in law.
6. In view of the disposal of the above Commercial Appeal,
nothing survives in the above Interim Applications and the same are
disposed of accordingly.
7. This order will be digitally signed by the Private
Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on
production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.
[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
JANUARY 2, 2024 Aarti Palkar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!