Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vandana W/O Purushottam Ingole And ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso, Civil Lines, Ps, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 3346 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3346 Bom
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2024

Bombay High Court

Vandana W/O Purushottam Ingole And ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso, Civil Lines, Ps, ... on 5 February, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:1535-DB
                                                                            901-apl 563-23.odt
                                                         1/5




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                         CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 563 OF 2023

                1.       Vandana Purushottam Ingole, Aged 53
                         years, Occup.Household,
                2.       Miss Darshana Purushottam Ingole, Aged
                         53 years, Occup. Private Both R/o Plot
                         No.10, Radhika Nagar, Near Vitthal
                         Mandir, Mangaldhan Colony, Dastur
                         Nagar, Post Rukmini Nagar, Amravati.                Applicants
                                           -Versus-

                1.       State of Maharashtra, through Police
                         Station Officer, Civil Lines, Police Station,
                         Akola.
                2.       Priyanka Umesh Gawande, Aged 31 years,
                         Occup. Household, R/o C/o Sudhakar
                         Tulshiram     Wankhede,  Sita    Gita
                         Apartments, Behind Ram Mandir, Sudhir
                         Colony Akola.                                        Non-
                                                                              applicants.
               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Mr.R.Tajne, counsel for the applicants.
                            Ms.Swati Kolhe, APP for non-applicant No.1.
                          Mr.J.B.Gandhi, counsel for non-applicant No.2.
               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND
                                                         VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
                                           DATE        : 5th February, 2024
               ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : Vinay Joshi, J.)

Heard.

Kavita.

901-apl 563-23.odt

2. Admit. The application is heard finally with the consent of

the learned counsel for the parties.

3. This is an application seeking to quash the charge-sheet in

RCC No.450 of 2023 arising out of Crime No. 21 of 2023

registered with Police Station Civil Lines, District Akola for the

offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 506 r/w 34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

4. Non-applicant No.2 informant has lodged the report with

the police on 23.01.2023 alleging matrimonial harassment which

caused to police to register crime and investigate the matter. After

completing the formalities of investigation, charge-sheet has been

filed. It is informed that yet the trial court has not framed charges.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants would

submit that the applicants are distant relatives having no

connection with matrimonial life of couple and thus, on vague

allegations, they have been falsely implicated. Particularly, it is

submitted that the reading of entire police report does not discloses

specific act attributing to present applicants and therefore,

Kavita.

901-apl 563-23.odt

continuation of prosecution amounts to abuse of the process of the

Court.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the non applicant as

well as learned APP resisted the application by contending that

after thorough investigation, police found prima facie case which

resulted into filing of charge-sheet. Moreover, it is submitted that

the police report discloses the relationship of applicants with the

husband and there are allegations that applicants have instigated

husband to harass the informant.

7. With the assistance of both sides, we have examined the

entire police report coupled with the statements recorded during

the course of investigation. On the basis of report, police have

registered the crime against the husband, mother-in-law, sister-in-

law and applicants, who are maternal aunt of husband and her

daughter. Particularly, our attention has been invited that the

matrimonial house of the informant was at village Nimbari,

Anjangaon surji whilst, the applicants are residing separately at

Amravati which was at the distance of 80-90 km from matrimonial

house. Rather the said fact is evident from the police report itself.

Kavita.

901-apl 563-23.odt

In that context, we have examined the allegations levelled against

the applicants. The marriage took place on 10.07.2019 and within

two weeks, the couple went to Pune, where they resided for a

considerable period. There is no allegation that the applicants have

either resided at matrimonial house or had been to Pune. The tenor

of police report only indicates a general allegation that all applicants

have taunted the informant as well as instigated the husband of

informant.

8. The material collected during the course of evidence does

not suggest any specific act attributing to the applicants. In the

reported case in the case of Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and others

Vs. State of Bihar and others reported in (2022)6 SCC 599, the

Hon'ble Supreme Court has expressed that the tendency of

implicating all relatives in the matrimonial proceeding is at rise. It

has been expressed that merely on the basis of vague and general

allegations, the distant relatives shall not be harassed by way of

implicating in domestic dispute. The above decision squarely

applies to the facts of this case since, there are no specific

allegations. In the circumstances, continuation of prosecution

Kavita.

901-apl 563-23.odt

against the applicants is nothing but abuse of the process of the

court. Facing a criminal trial is having serious repercussions.

Hence, interest of justice would be secured by quashing the

proceedings.

9. In view of above, application is allowed. We hereby quash

and set aside the charge-sheet in RCC No.450 of 2023 arising out

of Crime No.21 of 2023 registered with Police Station Civil Lines,

District Akola for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A,

506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code as regards to present

applicants only.

                                   (VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J)               (VINAY JOSHI, J)




Signed by: Kavita P Tayade
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 08/02/2024 10:29:34     Kavita.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter