Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3296 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2024
1 6- W.P. No.1071-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1071 OF 2024
Dnyneshwar Audumbar Mane And Others
....Petitioner
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
.....Respondent
.....
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. N. R. Pawade
AGP for Respondent State : Mrs. M. L. Sangit
....
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.
DATE : 02.02.2024
PER COURT :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
AGP for the respondent State.
2. It has been questioned whether revision under Section 257
of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1955 would lie against
the impugned order of condonation of delay.
3. The learned A.G.P. submits that this Court has taken a view
that there is no period prescribed under Section 32(1) of The
Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmenttion and Consolidation of
Holdings Act, 1947.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
there should be a delay of reasonable period of three years and
not more than three years. In this case, the delay for 52 years has
been condoned. He submits that against the impugned order Writ
is the only remedy. There are various judgments that writ is the
only remedy. He wants time to furnish the relevant case laws.
Time granted.
5. The Deputy Director, Land Record Aurangabad is directed to
complete the hearing, but not to declare the result till Court
directs.
6. List the matter on 26.02.2024.
( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE
ysk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!