Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22900 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024
2024:BHC-AUG:17387-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
966 WRIT PETITION NO. 9263 OF 2023
1. KRANTIKUMAR VENKATRAO DARMOD
2. BHAVANA VENKATRAO DARMOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. R.K. Mendadkar
a/w. Mr. Vijay Gangalwad and Mr. Sagar S. Phatale
AGP for Respondents : Mr. V.M. Jaware
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 06 AUGUST 2024
PER COURT [Shailesh P. Brahme, J.] :
This petition is disposed of finally in view of exigency
of the petitioners.
2. Petitioners are the siblings and they are aggrieved by
judgment and order dated 26.07.2023, invalidating and
confiscating their tribe certificates.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners tenders on record
application dated 01.12.2022 with affidavit of Pandharinath
Dharmaji Darmod which were submitted before Committee. He
2
would rely upon the validity certificate of real uncle Pandharinath
which was issued after following due procedure of law. The reason
assigned by the Committee for discarding validity of Pandharinath
is contended to be perverse.
4. Learned AGP tenders on record original file of validity
holder Panbdharinath. He would point out that school record of
Potanna and Kamalbai was incompatible and that of Vyankatrao
and Pandharinath was manipulated. He further submits that
validity certificate was rightly discarded by the Committee. The
Committee has issued show cause notice to Pandharinath.
5. We have considered rival submissions of the parties.
There is no dispute that Pandharinath is real uncle of the
petitioners. Vigilance enquiry was conducted in his matter and by
speaking order, he was issued with validity certificate by the
Committee.
6. We have gone through vigilance report and speaking
order from the original papers. The certificate of validity of
Pandharinath would corroborate the tribe claim. Unless the
validity is revoked, petitioners cannot be deprived of same social
3
status. The contrary entries and manipulation in the school record
pointed out by learned AGP would not deter us from issuing
conditional validity.
7. The petitioners are ready to run the risk as
contemplated by Shweta Balaji Isankar Versus State of
Maharashtra and others, passed by this High Court in Writ Petition
No. 5611/2018. Impugned judgment and order is liable to be
quashed. Hence, we pass following order :
ORDER
i. Writ Petition is allowed partly.
ii. Impugned judgment and order is quashed ans set aside.
iii. Respondent no. 2 - Scrutiny Committee shall issue tribe validity certificates to the petitioners forthwith subject to outcome of reverification of validity certificate of Pandharinath.
iv. Petitioners shall not claim any equity.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ]
Thakur-Chauhan/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!