Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Jt. Director Of Health ... vs Shailendra Prabhakarrao Bhoyar
2023 Latest Caselaw 3154 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3154 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2023

Bombay High Court
The Jt. Director Of Health ... vs Shailendra Prabhakarrao Bhoyar on 29 March, 2023
Bench: Avinash G. Gharote
                                                                       WP 136 of 2013.odt
                                                1

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.136/2013

     PETITIONERS : 1. The Joint Director of Health Services (Leprosy),
                      Parivartan building, Arogya Bhavan, Opposite
                      Vishrantwadi Police Station, Alandi Road,
                      Yerwada, Pune - 6.

                               2. The Assistant Director Health Services (Leprosy),
                                  Yavatmal, Tq. And District Yavatmal.

                                           ...VERSUS...

     RESPONDENT:                  Shailendra Prabhakarrao Bhoyar,
                                  Aged about - Major, R/o Sai Nagar,
                                  Wardha, Tq. and Distt. Wardha, at present
                                  R/o Pandharkawada, Tq. Kelapur, Distt.
                                  Yavatmal.

                                             WITH

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.102/2013

     PETITIONERS : 1. The Joint Director of Health Services (Leprosy),
                      Parivartan building, Arogya Bhavan, Opposite
                      Vishrantwadi Police Station, Alandi Road,
                      Yerwada, Pune - 6.

                               2. The Assistant Director Health Services (Leprosy),
                                  Yavatmal, Tq. And District Yavatmal.

                                           ...VERSUS...

     RESPONDENT:                  Narendra Anantrao Umbarkar,
                                  Aged about - Major, R/o Mahatma Fule Housing
                                  Society, Yavatmal, Tq. And Distt. Yavatmal.

                                             WITH


::: Uploaded on - 29/03/2023                          ::: Downloaded on - 31/03/2023 03:43:24 :::
                                                                               WP 136 of 2013.odt
                                                   2

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.137/2013

     PETITIONERS : 1. The Joint Director of Health Services (Leprosy),
                      Parivartan building, Arogya Bhavan, Opposite
                      Vishrantwadi Police Station, Alandi Road,
                      Yerwada, Pune - 6.

                               2. The Assistant Director Health Services (Leprosy),
                                  Yavatmal, Tq. And District Yavatmal.

                                            ...VERSUS...

     RESPONDENT:                 Mahesh Vasantrao Suryavanshi,
                                 Aged about - Major,
                                 R/o Parwati Lay Out, Umarsara, Tq. And
                                 Distt. Yavatmal.

                                                WITH

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.351/2013

     PETITIONERS : 1. The Joint Director of Health Services (Leprosy),
                      Parivartan building, Arogya Bhavan, Opposite
                      Vishrantwadi Police Station, Alandi Road,
                      Yerwada, Pune - 6.

                               2. The Assistant Director Health Services (Leprosy),
                                  Yavatmal, Tq. And District Yavatmal.

                                            ...VERSUS...

     RESPONDENT:                 Sharad Pandurang Athawale,
                                 Aged about - Major, R/o Zilla Parishad
                                 Colony, Umarkhed, Tq. - Umarkhed,
                                 Distt. Yavatmal.

     -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Shri N.R. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for the petitioners in all petitions
              Shri C.V. Jagdale, Advocate for respondent in all petitions
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


::: Uploaded on - 29/03/2023                                ::: Downloaded on - 31/03/2023 03:43:24 :::
                                                                    WP 136 of 2013.odt
                                             3

                                    CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 29/03/2023

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Heard Shri N.R. Patil, learned Assistant Government

Pleader for the petitioners and Shri C.V. Jagdale, learned counsel for

the respondents.

2. All these petitions question the judgments of the learned

Labour Court, whereby the termination of the respondents by the

orders dated 16/12/2000, 28/06/2000, 13/06/2000 and

26/11/2000 respectively was quashed and set aside and the

respondents/complainants were directed to be reinstated with

continuity in service without back wages. A revision against the

same came to be dismissed by the learned Industrial Court by the

judgment dated 21/07/2011.

3. The judgments of the learned Labour Court record a

categoric finding that the respondents/complainants had completed

more than 240 days in a year preceding the date of termination and

therefore, the satisfaction of the requirement of Section 25 F of the

Industrial Disputes Act was mandatory, which was not done.

4. Shri N.R. Patil, learned Assistant Government Pleader

has not been able to point out the satisfaction of the requirement of

WP 136 of 2013.odt

Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, considering which, I do

not see any reason to interfere in the impugned judgments. The writ

petitions are, therefore, dismissed. Rule stands discharged. No order

as to costs.

5. Needless to say that since it is contended by the

petitioners that there are no posts available, the petitioners would be

entitled to take such action, as they deemed fit and appropriate in

law, considering that position.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

Wadkar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter