Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2177 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2023
1-apeal-799-2015.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.799 OF 2015
SHAMRAO S/O RAMRAO BANSODE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. I. Dhoble
APP for Respondent - State : Mr. R. D. Sanap
...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 06, 2023. ORDER :- . It was informed that the appellant has gone absconding after
he was released on parole. The parole leave came to an end on
08.08.2016 and since then he has not reported back to the jail. It was
then also informed that at the behest of jailer, offence under Section
224 of Indian Penal Code was lodged against the appellant with
Parbhani Police Station and, therefore, by order dated 17.02.2023,
this Court had directed learned APP to take instructions as to what
steps were taken in that case. Today, he is submitting the report
which was submitted by Kotwali Police Station, Parbhani. The said
bunch is marked as Exhibit-A. It appears that the said case for the
1-apeal-799-2015.odt
offence under Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code is pending before
learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.6), Parbhani. Copy
of the charge-sheet is also filed. Part of the roznama is also filed. It
appears that the said Court is wasting its time in issuing notice to the
Investigating Officer. It was then stated that the said charge-sheet
has been filed taking recourse to Section 299 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, as the accused could not be arrested. This Court in catena
of judgments has held that Section 299 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure is an enabling Section which allows the Court to take
evidence in absence of the accused. It does not give a right to the
police to file charge-sheet. However, when the charge-sheet is
accepted, then the next stage would be to secure the presence of the
accused as production of accused along with the charge-sheet is not
mandatory. If the accused is not responding to the notice/summons,
then further coercive steps can be taken and also it can reach to the
stage of proclamation. The said case is pending since 2017 and no
such step appears to have been taken in response to the order passed
by this Court to get the instructions. It appears that on 01.03.2023,
Police Inspector, Kotwali Police Station made an application for
taking steps under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
against accused (present appellant). The order that has been passed
by the learned Magistrate is "Seen. Be kept in concerned file."
1-apeal-799-2015.odt
Certain clarifications are needed in this case and, therefore, learned
Registrar (Judicial) to make communication to the concerned
Magistrate and get information/clarification in respect of following
things :-
(i) Why it is taking so much of time to secure the presence of Investigating Officer.
(ii) What steps have been taken to secure the presence of the accused in that matter.
2. Such clarification be given on or before 23.03.2023.
3. No doubt, the said proceedings was one of the way to secure
the presence of the accused or get some information about the
appellant. Independently, now it has come that the accused has not
reported back to the jail. Hence, in order to secure his presence in
the present appeal, issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the appellant,
to be made returnable on 24.03.2023.
4. Place the matter for further consideration on 24.03.2023.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
scm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!