Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5511 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2023
--1- 950-wp-6232-23 + 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
950 WRIT PETITION NO.6232 OF 2023
DESTITUTE CHILDREN HOME THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
NARAYANRAO RAMKISHAN JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
...
961 WRIT PETITION NO.6244 OF 2023
RAMKRUSHNA BALSADAN BIJEWADI KANDHAR
THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT NARAYANRAO RAMKISHAN
JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
...
968 WRIT PETITION NO.6252 OF 2023
ANATH BALGRUHA CIDCO THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
NARAYANRAO RAMKISHAN JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
...
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 6282 OF 2023
GANDHI BALGRUHA, CIDCO, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
NARAYANRAO RAMKISHAN JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Jadhav Vinod B.
AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. A. S. Shinde
::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 16/06/2023 12:48:07 :::
--2- 950-wp-6232-23 + 3
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
DATE : 13 JUNE 2023
PER COURT :-
1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners in
all these petitions and the learned AGP.
2. The petitioners are the societies / trust running
Child Care Homes duly registered and issued with
licences as per the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and are now seeking
registration under the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Their requests are
pending with respondent No.1 -authority.
3. Suffice for the purpose to observe that some of
the relevant aspects as would be considered by the
respondent No.1 have been elaborately dealt with by
this Court in Writ Petition 7821/21 (Mother Teresa
Balakashram vs. The State of Maharashtra and
others) and connected matters by the judgment and
--3- 950-wp-6232-23 + 3
order dated 08 September 2022 to which one of us
(Mangesh S. Patil, J.) was a member. Obviously, he has
to bear in mind, the observations of this Court while
considering the petitioners' requests for renewal of the
licences.
4. The petitions are disposed of by directing
respondent No.1 to consider and decide the
petitioner's applications for renewal of the registration
on its own merits by extending an opportunity to them
to comply with the defciencies, if any, to be noticed
by him and in the light of our observations in Writ
Petition No.7821/21 (supra). The decision shall be
taken as expeditiously as possible and in any case
within eight weeks from the date of appearance of the
petitioners.
(S.G.CHAPALGAONKAR) (MANGESH S. PATIL)
JUDGE JUDGE
shp/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!