Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sureshchander S/O Manoharlal ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Ministry Of ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 329 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 329 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023

Bombay High Court
Sureshchander S/O Manoharlal ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Ministry Of ... on 9 January, 2023
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Vrushali V. Joshi
                                         1              wp4479.19

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

                  WRIT PETITION NO.4479 OF 2019

1)   Shri Sureshchander s/o Manoharlal
     Suri, aged about 60 years, occupation :
     Business, r/o 21, Clarke Town,
     Nagpur.

2)   Smt. Shashi w/o Subhash Sahani,
     aged about 65 years, occupation :
     Housewife, r/o 34, Clarke Town,
     Nagpur.

3)   Smt. Kamlesh w/o Ravi Choudhary,
     aged about 59 years, occupation :
     housewife, r/o 401, Chaitanya
     Apartments, Clarke Town, Nagpur.          ...   Petitioners
                     - Versus -
1)   State of Maharashtra, Ministry of
     Urban Development and Revenue
     and Forest Department,
     Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032.

2)   Nagpur Municipal Corporation,
     Nagpur, through its Municipal
     Commissioner, Civil Lines, Nagpur.

3)   Nagpur Improvement Trust,
     Kingsway, Nagpur, through its
     Chairman.

4)   The Collector, Civil Lines,
     Nagpur.

5)   Special Land Acquisition Officer,
     Nagpur Improvement Trust,
     Kingsway, Nagpur.                         ...   Respondents
             -----------------
                                        2                   wp4479.19

Shri M. Anilkumar, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for respondent
nos.1, 4 and 5.
Shri A.M. Kukday, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Shri S.M.Puranik, Advocate for respondent no.3.
            ----------------

                                 CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND
                                         MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : JANUARY 9, 2023

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) :

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

2) The petitioners claim to be owners of Khasra Nos.164,

165, 168, 169, 170, 171/1, 172/1, 175/1, 202, 203 and 211

admeasuring 37.38 acres situated at Mouza Nara, Tahsil and

District Nagpur. In the sanctioned development plan for the city of

Nagpur, the said land was shown to be reserved for "park". On

13/11/2017, notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional

and Town Planning Act, 1966 came to be issued to the Nagpur

Improvement Trust as well as to the Nagpur Municipal Corporation.

The said notice was received by the Nagpur Improvement Trust on

14/11/2017 and by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation on 3 wp4479.19

15/11/2017. Since no steps for acquiring the said land for the

purpose for which it was reserved was taken by the Planning

Authority, the petitioners seek a declaration that reservation in

question has lapsed in view of deeming fiction under Section 127 of

the said Act.

3) Heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused

the documents on record. It is seen from the notice dated

13/11/2017 that the same has been received by the Planning

Authority, which is now the Nagpur Improvement Trust. In the reply

filed by the Nagpur Improvement Trust, this aspect is not denied. It

is a further admitted position that within a period of twelve months

from receipt of that notice, no steps for acquiring the same were

initiated. Consequently, the deeming fiction provided under

Section 127(1) of the said Act would operate and this would result in

lapsing of the aforesaid reservation.

4) Hence, for the aforesaid reason, the following order is

passed :

It is declared that the reservation for "park" at serial

No.N-116 in the sanctioned development plan for the aforesaid

properties is deemed to have lapsed under Section 127 of the said 4 wp4479.19

Act. The respondent no.1 shall issue a notification indicating

lapsing of the aforesaid reservation within a period of six weeks from

receipt of copy of this judgment. The petitioners are free to develop

the said land in the manner permissible under the sanctioned

development plan for the adjoining property.

5) Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. The

petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

                                       JUDGE                                             JUDGE




                              khj




Digitally Signed By:KAMAL HUNDRAJ
JESWANI
Signing Date:10.01.2023 18:38
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter