Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maghnani Developers Thr Its ... vs The Additional Town Planning ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 32 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 32 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2023

Bombay High Court
Maghnani Developers Thr Its ... vs The Additional Town Planning ... on 2 January, 2023
Bench: R.D. Dhanuka, M. M. Sathaye
                                                                     14 wp 15677-22.doc




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        WRIT PETITION NO. 15677 OF 2022

                    Maghnani Developers through
                    its partner                             ..Petitioner
                          V/s.
                    The Additional Town Planning
                    Officer and Ors.                        ..Respondents
                                                ----
                    Mr. Suresh Sabrad a/w Abubakar Patel i/b JS legal for the
                    Petitioner.
       Digitally
                    Mr. G.S. Hegde a/w P.M. Bhansali for the Respondent Nos. 1 and
       signed by
       SNEHA
SNEHA NITIN
                    2.
                    Ms. K.N. Solunke, AGP for Respondent No.3/State.
NITIN  CHAVAN
CHAVAN Date:
       2023.01.02

                                                ----
       18:37:18
       +0530



                                          CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA, AND
                                                     M.M.SATHAYE, JJ.

DATE : 2nd JANUARY 2023

P.C.

. Rule. Shri.Hegde, waives service for Respondent Nos.1 and 2-CIDCO. Ms.K.N. Solunke, AGP for State-Respondent No.3. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to grant Occupancy Certificate for the building situate at Plot No. 97, admeasuring 1949.64 sq. meters at Section 18 Pt., Ulwe Node, Tal. Panvel, Dist. Raigad.

                         Sneha Chavan                                             page 1 of 3
                                                   14 wp 15677-22.doc


3. It is not in dispute that the application for Occupancy Certificate is pending on the ground that Public Interest Litigation relating to the subject matter is still pending before this Court.

4. We have perused the judgment delivered by this Court on 29.01.2020 in Writ Petition (St.) No.251 of 2020 in case of Pankaj Shankarlal Bhanushali & Ors. Vs. The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of City of Panvel & Ors. and also order dated 21.10.2022 passed by Division Bench of the this Court in Writ Petition No.11359 of 2022 in case of Reddy's Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited & Ors. directing the authority to grant Occupancy Certificate in respect of the subject property on its own merits within a period of two months from the date of order subject to the final out come of PIL No.154 of 2016 and PIL Nos.121 and 122 of 2019.

5. We adopt the same course and pass the following order:

a) CIDCO shall consider the application of the Petitioner for grant of Occupancy Certificate on its own merits, in respect of property described in prayer Clause (a) of the petition within two months from today.

b) In case, the Occupancy Certificate is granted in favour of the Petitioner by the CIDCO, the same shall be subject to final

Sneha Chavan page 2 of 3 14 wp 15677-22.doc

out come of PIL No.154 of 2016 and PIL Nos.121 and 122 of 2019.

c) It is made clear that the Petitioner or any other persons claiming through petitioner shall not be entitled to claim any equity in the event the order or proceedings are adverse to the interest of the Petitioner or a person claiming through the Petitioner.

d) We have passed this order in view of the fact that our co- ordinate bench has also already taken similar view and decided the matter more particularly in Writ Petition (St.) No.251 of 2020.

e) Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

M.M.SATHAYE, J.                               R.D.DHANUKA, J.




     Sneha Chavan                                               page 3 of 3
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter