Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12979 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2023
2023:BHC-AS:38186-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.15666 OF 2023
Atul Anant Sohoni, ]
Age : 50 years, Occ.: Business, ]
R/at : Bijlinagar, Pimpri Chinchwad 411033. ] .. Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Maharashtra, ]
Through Revenue Minister, ]
Ministry of Revenue, ]
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032. ]
2. Collector, ]
Collector Office, Pune. ]
3. Tehsildar, ]
Khed, Pune. ] .. Respondents
Mr. Suraj Gurav, i/by Mr. Aditya D. Gurav, for the Petitioner.
Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Addl. G.P., with Mr. S.L. Babar, AGP for the Respondent-
State.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ
DATE : 18TH DECEMBER, 2023.
ORAL JUDGMENT : { Per A.S. Chandurkar, J. }
1. RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and by consent heard learned
counsel for the parties. Learned AGP waives notice for the respondent-State.
2. The only prayer made by the petitioner is for expeditious consideration
9-WP-15666-2023.doc Dixit
and adjudication of the Revision Application that has been preferred by the
petitioner before the State Government under Section 79 of the Maharashtra
Hereditary Offices Act, 1874. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the Revision Application has been preferred in January, 2023
and in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 17 th December 2015,
the Revision Application is required to be decided within a period of one year of
it being assigned to the Revisional Authority. Despite aforesaid, no steps have
been taken to proceed with consideration of the Revision Application.
3. In the aforesaid facts and considering the stipulation under Government
Resolution dated 17th December 2015, the Writ Petition is disposed of by
directing the 1st respondent to consider and decide the pending Revision
Application within a period of four months on its own merits and in accordance
with law. The Revision Application shall be decided by 30 th April 2024, after
giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the parties likely
to be affected by its adjudication. All points on merits are kept open.
4. Rule is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.
[ FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 9-WP-15666-2023.doc Dixit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!