Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8037 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2023
17-FA-736-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 736 OF 2023
Peccadily Estate P. Ltd., Mumbai. ... Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ... Respondent
.....
Mr. Rohan Sawant a/w Chinmaya Achraya, Kevin Pereira, Disha
Jain i/b Viraj Jadhav, for the Appellant.
Mr. Santosh Parad, for the Respondent-MCGM.
.....
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATED : 8th AUGUST, 2023.
P.C.
Mr. Parad, learned Counsel for the respondent, has placed
reliance on the judgment of this court in the case of Naman
Developers Pvt. Ltd. and .. vs Municipal Corporation of Greater
Mumbai, 2002(6) BomCR 561 which, according to him, clarified
the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of The
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. M/s. Polychem Ltd.
reported in (1974) 2 Supreme Court Cases, 198.
Rekha Patil 1 of 2
17-FA-736-2023.doc
2 Mr. Parad has also invited my attention to para 13 of the
impugned order passed by the Additional Chief Judge, Small Causes
Court, Mumbai, wherein it is observed that there is no compliance
of sub-Section 5 of Section 217 of the Mumbai Municipal
Corporation Act by the appellant. If there was no compliance as
above, there was no question of hearing the appeal and deciding the
same by the Chief Judge of the Small Causes Court.
3 Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks time to take
instructions as to whether there was due compliance of said
provisions.
4 At his request, list on 18th August, 2023.
[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]
Rekha Patil 2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!