Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7883 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2023
2023:BHC-AUG:16580-DB
905(i)-appln-1970-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1969 OF 2023
IN APEAL/132/2023
Samadhan Bajirao Sonwane and another .. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
...
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1970 OF 2023
IN APEAL/920/2023
Sahebrao Punjaji Sonwane and another .. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
...
Mr. Shailesh S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for applicants in both the
matters.
Mr. S. J. Salgare, Advocate for respondent No.1 - State in both the
matters.
...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 04, 2023.
ORDER :-
. Heard learned Advocate for the applicants - original appellants.
2. This Court by judgments dated 01.03.2023 and 05.01.2023
respectively allowed the appeals and directed the release of appellants
- applicants on bail. The appellants came to be arrested in
[1]
905(i)-appln-1970-2023
connection with Crime No.322 of 2022 registered with Kopargaon
Police Station, Dist. Ahmednagar for the offences punishable under
Sections 302, 354, 294, 326, 324, 323, 504, 506, 509, 143, 144, 147,
148, 149, 427 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)
(s), 3(2)(5), 3(2)(v-a), 3(1)(w), 3(1)(g) of the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. In the said
judgments, condition No.(iv) was imposed while releasing the them
on bail of which the applicants want relaxation. The said condition
No.(iv) reads thus :-
"iv) The appellants shall not enter the jurisdiction of village Manjur, Tq. Kopargaon, Dist. Ahmednagar till the conclusion of trial. They should reside elsewhere, and before submission of bail papers, the appellants should give complete address of their residence with their mobile numbers to the Trial Court as well as to the Investigating Officer."
3. It is to be noted from those judgments itself that this Court had
taken note of the long standing rivalry and, therefore, it was
specifically observed that taking into consideration the long standing
rivalry, same restrictions are required to be imposed on the appellants
also, which were imposed on the co-accused. Definitely, the liberty of
each citizen is of prime importance, but when it comes to granting of
[2]
905(i)-appln-1970-2023
bail, the Courts are required to take into consideration the fear in the
mind of the witnesses also. Life and liberty of the witnesses is also
equally important and, therefore, the said condition was imposed,
which need not be relaxed till the conclusion of the trial. Hence, the
applications stand rejected.
[ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.]
scm
[3]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!