Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4432 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
WP 942-2023 1 Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 942 OF 2023
1. Ashokrao Marotrao Nagpure,
aged about 63 years,
Occ. Retired as Cook,
C/o Sahebrao Patil Primary Ashram School,
Mardi, Tah. Tiosa, District - Amravati.
2. Suresh s/o Narayanrao Meshram,
aged about 62 years,
Occ. Retired as Cook,
C/o Sahebrao Patil Primary Ashram School,
Mardi, Tah. Tiosa, District - Amravati.
PETITIONERS
.....VERSUS.....
1. The State of Maharashtra,
through its Secretary,
Social Welfare Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
2. The Divisional Social Welfare Officer,
Amravati Division, Amravati.
3. The Assistant Commissioner Social Welfare, Amravati,
District - Amravati.
RESPONDENTS
Shri R.N. Ghuge, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents/ State.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.
DATE : 28th APRIL, 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned
Counsel for the parties.
2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice for
the respondents.
::: Uploaded on - 29/04/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2023 17:23:58 :::
WP 942-2023 2 Judgment
3. Each petitioner claims to be working as non-teaching staff in
private Ashram Schools in the District of Amravati. The petitioners seek
benefit of the Government Resolution dated 30/04/1998 as modified
from time to time.
4. It is seen that the issues raised in the Writ Petition have been
considered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 2358/2013 (Kiran Namdeo
Shinde and Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, thr. Secretary, Social
Welfare Dept. and Ors.) decided on 21/09/2013 with other connected
Writ Petitions.
5. In view of aforesaid, for the reasons stated in that judgment,
the following order is passed :
ORDER
The order dated 1/12/2022 passed by respondent No.3 is set
aside. The respondents are directed to examine the cases of each of the
individual petitioner for deciding whether they satisfy the criteria laid
down for claiming benefits under the ACPs to the private aided
Government Schools under the Government Resolution dated
30/04/1998 as modified from time to time and if it is found that the
petitioners are entitled to claim benefits under the scheme and they
satisfy the eligibility criteria, the respondents shall extend the benefits to
WP 942-2023 3 Judgment
the petitioners. The respondents shall scrutinize the cases of individual
petitioners within a period of six months and extend the benefits to such
of the petitioners, who are found eligible as expeditiously as possible and
preferably within a period of four months from such scrutiny.
Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No costs.
(M.W. CHANDWANI, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) SUMIT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!