Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3508 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2023
52-WP622.23-J.odt
1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 622 OF 2023
Petitioners Ms Vedika d/o Sunil Pawar, aged 18 years, Occ.
Student, R/o Rajmata Nagar, Sundarkhed,
Buldhana.
-Vs.-
Respondent The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny
Committee, Yavatmal, through its Member
Secretary.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.P.R.Parsodkar, counsel for the Petitioner.
Ms N.P.Mehta, AGP for the respondent.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR &
M.W.CHANDWANI, JJ.
DATE : 10 APRIL, 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : A.S.Chandurkar, J.)
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard
finally.
2. The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the order passed by
KHUNTE
52-WP622.23-J.odt
the respondent-Scrutiny Committee on 23/12/2022 invalidating the
petitioner's claim of belonging to "Thakur" Scheduled Tribe.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute that
the petitioner's uncle Prakash as well as her cousins Pallavi and Aditya have
been held to belong to "Thakur" Scheduled Tribe pursuant to the judgment
of this Court in Writ Petition Nos.6022 and 6457 of 2017. By the judgment
dated 05/03/2019, this Court considered the document dated 22/09/2018
relating to the petitioner's great grandfather Tukaram with the entry
"Thakur". The subsequent entry of the year 1930 as "Bhat" has also been
taken into consideration. After considering all relevant documents, this
Court directed issuance of validity certificate to the petitioner's uncle and
cousins. We find that the petitioner is relying upon very same documents
and therefore, in view of the judgment in Apoorva Vinay Nichale v.
Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1 and others, reported in
2010 (6) Mh.L.J. 401, the petitioner would be entitled for the benefit of the
same.
4. Hence, for the reasons recorded in the judgment in Writ Petition
Nos.6022 and 6457 of 2017, it is held that the petitioner has proved that
she belongs to "Thakur" Scheduled Tribe.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed. The order
passed by the respondent-Scrutiny Committee dated 23/12/2022 is set
KHUNTE
52-WP622.23-J.odt
aside. The respondent-Scrutiny Committee shall within a period of four
weeks from the receipt of copy of the judgment issue validity certificate to
the petitioner.
6. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to
costs.
(M.W.CHANDWANI, J) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J) KHUNTE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!