Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vitthal Rajaram Shitole vs The Collector, Pune And Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 3315 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3315 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2023

Bombay High Court
Vitthal Rajaram Shitole vs The Collector, Pune And Ors on 3 April, 2023
Bench: R.D. Dhanuka, Gauri Godse
2023:BHC-AS:10292-DB


                                                                  36-WP- 3971-2023.doc


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 3971 OF 2023

            Vitthal Rajaram Shitole
            Age: 52 years Occ: Agriculturist,
            Residing at Post Koregaonmul, Taluka Haveli,
            District- Pune.                                           .. Petitioner
                        Vs.
            1. The Collector, Pune,
                Having his office at New Collector
                Office Building, Opp. Sasoon Hospital,
                Station Road, Pune - 411 001.


            2. The Tahsildar, Taluka Haveli,
                District Pune, Having address at
                Shukrawar Peth, Khadak Mal,
                Ali, Pune - 411 002.


            3. Gram Vikas Adhikari,
               Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul,
               Taluka Haveli, District - Pune.


            4. Bhanudas Khanderao Jedhe
                Age: 44 yrs, Occ: Agriculturist,


            5. Bapusaheb Yashwant Bodhe
               Age: 68 yrs, Occ: Agriculturist,


            Ganesh Lokhande                                                page 1 of 7




                   ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2023              ::: Downloaded on - 06/04/2023 05:11:09 :::
                                               36-WP- 3971-2023.doc


6. Leelavai Bapusaheb Bodhe
   Age: 67 yrs, Occ: Agriculturist,


7. Vaishali Amit Sawant,
    Age: 40 yrs, Occ: Housewife,


8. Ashwini Chintamani Gadh
    Age: 36 yrs, Occ: Housewife,


9. Sachin Gulab Nikalje
    Age: 35 yrs, Occ: Agriculturist,


10. Mangal Jagannath Pawar
     Age: 40 yrs, Occ: Housewife,


11. Radhika Santosh Kakade
     Age: 39 yrs, Occ: Housewife,


12. Mangesh Ashok Kankate,
     Age: 28 yrs, Occ: Agriculturist,


13. Pallavi Ramesh Nazirkar
     Age: 35 yrs, Occ. Agriculturist,


14. Dattatraya Dnyaneshwar Kakade
     Age: 35 yrs, Occ.: Agriculturist,


15. Manisha Nandakishore Kad


Ganesh Lokhande                                        page 2 of 7




       ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2023      ::: Downloaded on - 06/04/2023 05:11:09 :::
                                                               36-WP- 3971-2023.doc


     Age: 42 yrs, Occ: Agriculturist,
     Respondent Nos. 4 to 15 are
     residing at Post Koregaonmul, Taluka Haveli,
  District: Pune - 412 202.


16. The Talathi, Koregaonmul, Taluka Haveli,
      District: Pune.


17. State of Maharashtra                                         .. Respondents


Ms. Sneha Bhange h/f. Mr. C. B. Nikte for the Petitioner.
Mr. N. K. Rajpurohit, AGP for the State.
Dr. U. P. Warunjikar a/w. Ms. Neha G. Deshpande i/b. Mr. Aadesh
Konde Deshmukh for Respondent Nos. 4 to 13.
Mr. Sumedh Ruikar for Respondent No.3.
Mr. Prajit S. Sahane, for Respondent Nos. 14 and 15.


                                  CORAM:- R.D. DHANUKA &
                                          GAURI GODSE, JJ.

                                  DATE   :- 03 APRIL, 2023.



ORAL JUDGMENT: (PER : - R. D. DHANUKA, J)


1.                Matter is on board and mentioned out of turn.



2.                Rule. Learned counsel for the Respondents waive

service. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent

of the parties.


Ganesh Lokhande                                                       page 3 of 7




       ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2023                    ::: Downloaded on - 06/04/2023 05:11:09 :::
                                                         36-WP- 3971-2023.doc


3.                This matter was on board on 30th March, 2023, when

this Court recorded the no objection of the Petitioner and

Respondent Nos. 4 to 13 to quash and set aside the impugned

order by consent of the parties passed by the Collector and

remand the matter back to the Collector for deciding the dispute

filed by the Petitioner in accordance with law. Since the

Respondent Nos. 3, 14 and 15 were not present earlier, this Court

could not dispose of the Petition.



4.                Respondent Nos. 3, 14 and 15 today appeared through

their respective counsel and recorded similar no objection which

was recorded between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 4 to 13.

Statement is accepted.



5.                All the parties are agreeable for quashing and setting

aside the order passed by the Collector and for remanding the

dispute filed by the Petitioner before the Collector, hence we pass

the following order:

                                      ORDER

(i) The impugned order dated 23rd March, 2023 passed

by the Respondent No.1 Collector in Dispute

Ganesh Lokhande page 4 of 7

36-WP- 3971-2023.doc

Application No. 32 of 2023, is quashed and set

aside;

(ii) The dispute filed by the Petitioner before the

Respondent No.1 Collector i.e. Dispute Application

No. 32 of 2023 be restored to file;

(iii) The Collector to pass fresh order in the said dispute

after hearing the parties within four weeks from the

date of granting personal hearing;

(iv) The parties are directed to remain present before

the Respondent No.1-Collector on 12 th April, 2023

at 11.00. a.m;

(vi) The Collector to pass an order in the said dispute

Application on its own merits and in accordance

with law and without being influenced by impugned

order dated 23rd March, 2023 passed by the

Respondent No.1-Collector;

(vii) If the order passed by Respondent No.1-Collector is

adverse against any of the parties, the order shall

not be implemented for a period of one week;

Ganesh Lokhande                                                   page 5 of 7





                                                            36-WP- 3971-2023.doc




(viii) It is made clear that if any adverse order is passed

against the Petitioner or any parties supporting the

Petitioner, fresh Election shall not be held without

complying the mandatory period prescribed under

the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959;

(ix) The Collector would be at liberty to call for the

requisite records from the office of Tahsildar for the

purpose of scrutinizing the dispute application filed

by the Petitioner. The parties before the Collector

would be at liberty to take inspection of the records

and proceedings called for by the Collector from the

office of Tahsildar;

(x) The Collector would be also at liberty to call for the

records from the office of the Caste Scrutiny

Committee relating to the Caste Validity Certificate

produced by some of the parties to the proceedings;

(xi) The Collector shall give inspection to all the parties

of all the documents which he proposes to rely upon

for deciding the dispute application.

Ganesh Lokhande                                                     page 6 of 7





                                                           36-WP- 3971-2023.doc




6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions,

states that his client does not propose to take the charge of post of

Sarpanch, in view of the fact that no confidence motion decided by

the Tahsildar is not set aside by this order. Statement is accepted.

Till the issue is decided by the Collector in the dispute application

filed by the Petitioner, Deputy Sarpanch who has taken charge on

the post of Sarpanch, shall continue to act in the same position.

7. The Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

8. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

9. All parties to act on authenticated copy of this order.

 (GAURI GODSE, J.)                                   ( R.D.DHANUKA, J. )




Ganesh Lokhande                                                    page 7 of 7





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter