Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9753 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2022
Digitally
signed by
UTKARSH
UTKARSH KAKASAHEB
KAKASAHEB BHALERAO
BHALERAO Date:
2022.09.29
12:39:09
+0530
16.arbap.5.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2022
Sepio Products Pvt. Ltd. .. Applicant
Vs.
Denlob Technologies Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Adv. Mr. Vicky Singh a/w Adv. Mr. Meit Sampat i/b Little & Co. for the
Applicant.
CORAM:- B. P. COLABAWALLA,J.
DATE :- SEPTEMBER 26, 2022.
P. C.:
1. The above Arbitration Application is filed under Section 11
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the Arbitration
Act") seeking the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal.
2. The disputes between the Applicant and the Respondent
have arisen because of non-payment of supply of goods by the Applicant
to the Respondent. In the facts of this case, before the Respondent-
Company purchases any goods of the Applicant, it has to accept the
terms and conditions on the website of the Applicant i.e.
Utkarsh page 1 of 5
16.arbap.5.2022.doc
www.sepioproducts.com which contains an Arbitration clause (clause
28 thereof). Clause 28 reads thus:
"28. Any dispute and/or disagreement, arising under these Terms shall be settled through consultation and conciliation process among the Company and the Buyer. If the dispute cannot be amicably settled between the Parties within one month after a request to settle the dispute amicably has been made to the other Party, the dispute or difference shall be referred to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and any amendment thereto. The arbitral tribunal shall comprise of a sole arbitrator nominated by the Company. The Venue of arbitration shall be Mumbai, India and the language shall be English."
3. As can be seen from this clause, the power to appoint the
Sole Arbitrator is with the Applicant. The Applicant therefore
nominated Advocate Mr. Kunal Vaishnav as the Sole Arbitrator to
decide the disputes and differences between the parties. However, the
Sole Arbitrator, by order dated 23rd November 2021, terminated the
arbitration proceedings on the ground that the Applicant could not
unilaterally constitute the Arbitral Tribunal. This finding was given in
the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Perkins
Eastman Architects DPC & Anr. VS HSCC (India) Ltd. reported at in
2019 SCC Online 1517. It is because of this termination the present
Application under Section 11 is filed seeking the appointment of a Sole
Utkarsh page 2 of 5
16.arbap.5.2022.doc
Arbitrator.
4. The Respondents have been duly served as reflected in the
order dated 23rd August, 2022 as well as the affidavit of service tendered
today dated 12th September, 2022. Despite service, none have appeared
on behalf of the Respondent.
5. In these circumstances and considering what is stated in
the Section 11 Application and which is not controverted by the
Respondent, the following order is passed:
(a) Mrs. Sneha Phene, an advocate of this Court, is hereby appointed
to act as a Sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences
between the Applicant and the Respondent arising out of and/or
in connection with and/or in relation to the Purchase Order No.
1920000470 and Purchase Order No. 1920001059.
(b) A copy of this order will be communicated to the learned Sole
Arbitrator by the advocates for the Applicant within a period of
one week from today.
(c) The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward his Statement
of Disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the
Utkarsh page 3 of 5
16.arbap.5.2022.doc
Arbitration Act to the advocates for the Applicant so as to enable
them to file the same in the Registry of this Court. The Registry of
this Court shall retain the said Statement on the file of this
Application and a copy of the same shall be furnished by the
advocates for the Applicant to the Respondent.
(d) The parties shall appear before the learned Sole Arbitrator on
such date and at such place as she nominates to obtain
appropriate directions with regard to fixing a schedule for
completing pleadings etc. The Arbitral Tribunal shall give all
further directions with reference to the arbitration and also as to
how it is to proceed.
(e) Contact and communication particulars shall be provided by all
sides to the learned Sole Arbitrator within a period of one week
from today. This information shall include a valid and functional
email address as well as mobile numbers of the respective
advocates.
(f) The Sole Arbitrator shall charge her fees as per the 4th Schedule
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with the
Bombay High Court (Fee payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018.
Utkarsh page 4 of 5
16.arbap.5.2022.doc
(g) The Arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitrator will be borne by the
parties equally and will be subject to any final Award passed by
the Tribunal. If the Respondent does not appear before the
Tribunal then all the arbitral costs and the fees of the arbitrator
shall be borne, at the first instance, by the Applicant, subject to
the final Award that may be passed by the Tribunal in that
regard.
6. The above Section 11 Application is disposed of in the
aforesaid terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
7. This order will be digitally signed by the Private
Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on
production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.
( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. )
Utkarsh page 5 of 5
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!