Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rohan Dilip Bhandekar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 3541 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3541 Bom
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2022

Bombay High Court
Rohan Dilip Bhandekar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 31 March, 2022
Bench: Prakash Deu Naik
                                                                                  14- IA-950-2022-in- APEAL-288-2022.doc




                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 950 OF 2022
                                                                   IN
                                                     CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 288 OF 2022

                              Rohan Dilip Bhandekar                               ...Applicant/Appellant
                                    Versus
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Anr.                   ...Respondents
                                                              ....
                              Mr. Tukaram S. Shendge, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant
                              Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State.

                                                       CORAM       :        PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                                       DATE        :        31st MARCH, 2022.

                              PER COURT:

                              1.                 Leave to amend the prayer clause '(b)' in application.

                              Amendment may be carried out forthwith.

                              2.                 This is an application for suspension of sentence and

                              grant of bail during pendency of Criminal Appeal No.288 of 2022

                              challenging the judgment of conviction.

                              3.                 The   applicant   has     been   convicted         for     offence

                              punishable under Section 363 of Indian Penal Code (for short

                              "IPC") and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four

                              years and to pay fine of Rs.50,000/-.

                              4.                 The applicant was charged for offences under Sections
           Digitally signed

SAJAKALI
           by SAJAKALI
           LIYAKAT
           JAMADAR
                              363, 376 of IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from
LIYAKAT    Date:
JAMADAR    2022.04.01
           18:47:22
           +0530



                              Sajakali Jamadar                         1 of 3
                                                  14- IA-950-2022-in- APEAL-288-2022.doc




Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short 'POCSO Act'). The applicant

was aged around 18 years at the time of incident. It was alleged

that the applicant/accused had sexually assaulted the victim.

During trial, the victim had not supported the prosecution case qua

sexual assault and hence the applicant was acquitted for offence

under Section 376 of IPC.

5.                 The applicant is in custody for a period of about three

years and nine months. The sentence imposed by the trial Court is

four years.

6.                 Considering the aforesaid circumstances, the sentence

of imprisonment can be suspended and bail can be granted to

applicant.

7.                 Hence, I pass the following order:

                                    ORDER

i. Interim Application No. 950 of 2022 is allowed;

ii. During the pendency of Criminal Appeal No.288 of 2022, the sentence of imprisonment imposed vide Judgment and order dated 9th December, 2021 passed by learned Special Judge under POCSO Act, Pune in Special POCSO S.C. No. No.328 of 2018 is suspended and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

Sajakali Jamadar 2 of 3 14- IA-950-2022-in- APEAL-288-2022.doc

iii. The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- for a period of ten weeks in lieu of surety.

iv. The applicant shall attend the trial Court once in six months on first Saturday of the month till the final disposal of the appeal;

v. In the event, there are two consecutive defaults in attending the trial Court, the said fact may be brought to the notice of this Court and in such eventuality, the prosecution will be at liberty to prefer an application for cancellation of bail.

vi. Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly.


                                            (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)




Sajakali Jamadar                      3 of 3
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter