Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5794 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2022
1 CA / 2688 /2022+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2688 OF 2022
IN WP/10400/2018
MAYA BABAN ADHAV
VERSUS
MACHHINDRA LAXMAN RAKSHE AND OTHERS
AND
920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2689 OF 2022
IN WP/10402/2018
MAYA BABAN ADHAV
VERSUS
MUKESH MACHHINDRA RAKSHE AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.R. Shirsath h/f. Mr. Rakh Arun V.
Advocate for the respondent no. 5 : Mr. N.C. Garud
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 23 JUNE 2022
PC :
Heard.
2. While deciding the writ petition by the judgment and order
dated 09-03-2020, the trial court was directed to decide the suit by
31-10-2020 and the interim relief was extended till that date even
though the writ petition was being disposed of.
3. Since thereafter, from time to time, the interim relief has
been extended on the ground that the suit has not been decided.
4. In the order dated 01-09-2021, it was specifically noted
that in spite of the fact that the suit was made time bound by this court
2 CA / 2688 /2022+
and the time had lapsed long back, the trial court was also not making
request seeking extension of the time. Even the office seems to be not
pursuing the matter with the trial court.
5. Registrar (Judicial) shall take a note of the fact and solicit a
report from the trial court.
6. Interim relief is extended up to 29 July 2022.
7. Let there be a report from the trial court by then.
[ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE arp/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!