Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6925 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2022
909-CA NO.3354 OF 2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3354 OF 2022
IN WP/3451/2002 WITH CA/379/2022 IN WP/3451/2002
THE MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHATANA
VERSUS
THE DIVISIONAL SEED CERTIFICATION OFFICER
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dinkar G. Kamble
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. U. S. Malte
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 19 JULY 2022 PER COURT :
It appears that, though several of the employees are seeking to
withdraw the amount of compensation determined by this court while
disposing of Writ Petition No. 3273 of 2002 and the connected writ petition by
the common judgment and order dated 21 October 2015, it appears that since
the compensation is to be apportioned amongst number of employees, in view
of the observations in para nos.13 and 14, age of each of such employee would
be a decisive factor. The applicant to explain as to if they have complied with
directions in paragraph no.14 and shall produce proof regarding their date of
birth.
909-CA NO.3354 OF 2022.odt
2. Learned advocate for the applicant seeks time.
3. Stand over to 10-08-2022.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
Tandale/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!