Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 857 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2022
925 SA 32 OF 2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
925 SECOND APPEAL NO.32 OF 2022
WITH CA/661/2022 IN SA/32/2022
AMBADAS VITTHAL HAJARE
VERSUS
DATTU KISAN JADHAV AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Salunke Pradeep
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. C.R. More h/f Mr. Vishalkumar S. Pardeshi.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 21.01.2022. PER COURT :
The appellant is the original plaintiff seeking specific performance of agreement to sell an immovable property. The suit was decreed by the trial court but the judgment and decree has been reversed by the appellate Court by the judgment under challenge.
2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within six weeks. Mr. Pardeshi learned advocate appears for both the respondents. Mr. More learned advocate on his behalf seeks time.
3. During pendency of the appeal before the District Court, an interim relief was in operation till its decision restraining the respondents from creating any third party interest. Consequently, the same relief stands extended up to the next date.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!