Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arjun Anandrao Sidhemod vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 1433 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1433 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2022

Bombay High Court
Arjun Anandrao Sidhemod vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 10 February, 2022
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, S. G. Dige
                                     1              986- wp 1104-2022.odt



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 1104 OF 2022

 Arjun Anandrao Sidhemod                                         .. Petitioner

          Versus

 The State of Maharashtra and others                             .. Respondents

 Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioner.
 Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 5.
 Mr. Anandsingh Bayas, Advocate for Respondent No. 3.

                               CORAM :    S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
                                          S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATED : 10th FEBRUARY 2022.

PER COURT:-

. The tribe claim of the petitioner as belonging to "Mannervarlu"

(Scheduled Tribe) is invalidated.

2. Mr. Thorat, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

real brother of the petitioner namely Ganesh has been issued with the

validity certificate of "Mannervarlu" (Scheduled Tribe). Detail vigilance

was conducted and all the documents from the year 1966 were

considered while granting validity to him. The learned counsel submits

that Ananda is the father of the present petitioner. His school record of

the first standard records tribe as "Mannervarlu". The same was

verified by the vigilance in the proceedings of the real brother of the

1 of 4

2 986- wp 1104-2022.odt

petitioner namely Ganesh. Now, the present vigilance takes other view

saying that they could not find that entry. The learned counsel further

submits that the entry of the year 1991 referred to in case of Ananda is

of his service book and not the school record. In the school record of

the fifth standard the entry is claimed to be of "Munnurwad", however

earlier entry is of "Mannervarlu" as is confirmed by the vigilance in

case of real brother of the petitioner. The school record of real uncles

of the petitioner namely Sainath and Digambar records tribe as

"Mannervarlu". The learned counsel relies on the judgment of the

Division Bench of this Court in case of Apoorva D/o Vinay Nichale Vs.

Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1 and Ors. reported

in 2010 (6) Mh.L.J. 401.

3. The learned A.G.P. submits that the brother of the petitioner was

given the benefit of validity granted to a person who was not related to

the petitioner on the paternal side. In the present matter, minute

vigilance has been conducted. While granting validity to Ganesh - real

brother of the petitioner the vigilance was not conducted minutely. The

contra entries have been considered.

4. We have considered the submissions canvassed by the learned

counsel for respective parties.



                                                                                2 of 4





                                       3              986- wp 1104-2022.odt


5. It is not disputed by the respondents that real brother of the

petitioner namely Ganesh s/o Anandrao is issued with the validity

certificate of "Mannervarlu" (Scheduled Tribe). Vigilance was

conducted while issuing validity certificate to Ganesh. The school

records of Ananda s/o Vitthal, Digambar s/o Vitthal, Sainath s/o

Vitthal, Baburao s/o Vitthal, Savita d/o Anandrao, Arjun s/o Anandrao

and Ganesh s/o Anandrao were all considered. The entry in the school

record of Ananda at Sr. No. 1105 dated 16.07.1973 was also verified

and vigilance therein found the entry of tribe recorded as

"Mannervarlu". In the present case, the entry of Ananda dated

21.06.1977 is shown to have been recorded as contra, however entry of

the year 1973 is not considered. There are two contrary vigilance

report in case of real brother of the petitioner and in the present

matter.

6. In view of the vigilance conducted in the case of real brother of

the petitioner and validity issued to him, so also majority of the entries

relied were subject matter of consideration and that show cause notice

issued to real brother of the petitioner, we pass the following order.

7. The committee shall issue validity certificate to the petitioner of

"Mannervarlu" (Scheduled Tribe). The said validity certificate shall be

subject to the decision that would be taken by the committee in the

3 of 4

4 986- wp 1104-2022.odt

proceedings reopened of the validity holders relied by the petitioner.

8. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

 ( S. G. DIGE )                                 ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
    JUDGE                                                 JUDGE




 P.S.B.




                                                                               4 of 4





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter