Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gateway Distriparks Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 1246 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1246 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2022

Bombay High Court
Gateway Distriparks Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income ... on 3 February, 2022
Bench: K.R. Sriram, N. J. Jamadar
                                                    231_WP2269&group_11.doc


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
              ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                       WRIT PETITION NO.2269 OF 2011
                                  WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.2270 OF 2011
                                  WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.2271 OF 2011
                                  WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.2272 OF 2011

Gateway Distriparks Limited                               ...     Petitioner
Vs.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 3(1)
and others                                                ...     Respondents

Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Petitioner.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
                                         CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &
                                                 N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2022 P.C. :-

1. Mr. Agrawal for petitioner states that in view of the following judgments / orders passed by this Court as well as the Apex Court, petitions should be allowed:-

(a) Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 Vs. Container Corporation of India Limited reported in [2018] 93 taxmann.com 31 (SC);

(b) Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation reported in [2015] 374 ITR 645 (Bom);

(c) Order dated 9th April 2019 passed by this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.260 of 2017 with Income Tax Appeal No.185 of 2017 [PCIT Vs. M/s. Gateway Distriparks Limited]; and

(d) Order dated 26th August 2019 passed by this Court in

231_WP2269&group_11.doc

Income Tax Appeal No.707 of 2017 [PCIT Vs. Gateway Distriparks Limited].

2. Mr. Suresh Kumar agrees with the law as laid down.

3. Therefore, we allow each of the petitions in terms of prayer clause

(a), which read as under:-

Prayer (a) of W.P.No.2269 of 2011 "(a) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the case leading to the issue of the Impugned Notice (Exhibit G) and passing of the Impugned Order (Exhibit J) and after going through the same and examining the question of legality thereof to quash, cancel and set aside Impugned Notice (Exhibit G) and the Impugned Order (Exhibit J);"

Prayer (a) of W.P.No.2270 of 2011 "(a) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the case leading to the issue of the Impugned Notice (Exhibit I) and passing of the Impugned Order (Exhibit L) and after going through the same and examining the question of legality thereof to quash, cancel and set aside Impugned Notice (Exhibit I) and the Impugned Order (Exhibit L);"

Prayer (a) of W.P.No.2271 of 2011

"(a) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the case leading to the issue of the Impugned Notice (Exhibit F) and passing of the Impugned Order (Exhibit I) and after going through the same and examining the question of legality thereof to quash, cancel and set aside Impugned Notice (Exhibit F) and the Impugned Order (Exhibit I);" Prayer (a) of W.P.No.2272 of 2011

"(a) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the case leading to the issue of the Impugned Notice (Exhibit F)

231_WP2269&group_11.doc

and passing of the Impugned Order (Exhibit I) and after going through the same and examining the question of legality thereof to quash, cancel and set aside Impugned Notice (Exhibit F) and the Impugned Order (Exhibit I);"

4. Petitions disposed.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)                           (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)




Minal Parab






 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter