Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aadim Anusuchit Thakur Jamat ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 4055 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4055 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2022

Bombay High Court
Aadim Anusuchit Thakur Jamat ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 18 April, 2022
Bench: R.D. Dhanuka, S. G. Mehare
                                           1                            24-PIL-71-21.odt



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.71 OF 2021
                           WITH PIL/59/2021

      MAHARASHTRA ADIWASI THUKUR JAMAT SEVA MANDAL
                    CHALISGAON AND ANOTHER
                               VERSUS
            THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                  ...
         Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Mahesh S. Deshmukh
     AGP for Respondents no.1 and 2 - State : Mr. S. G. Karlekar
                                  ...

                                        CORAM :     R. D. DHANUKA &
                                                    S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
                                        DATE    :   18-04-2022
PER COURT :-


Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners invited our

attention to the orders passed by this court, dated 22.09.2021

and 06.12.2021 in these Public Interest Litigations and submit

that this court has already issued direction in respect of the

Cabinet decision dated 03.09.2019 pursuant to which the

Government Resolution dated 13.09.2019 was issued, thereby

establishing additional Tribe Scrutiny Committees at Dhule, Gondia

and Chandrapur. The said Cabinet decision is sought to be

changed and a decision is taken now to do away with the Scrutiny

Committee at Dhule, Chandrapur and Gondia and have additional

Scrutiny Committees at Nandurbar, Nagpur and Gadchiroli, is not

supported by any cabinet decision.

2 24-PIL-71-21.odt

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners also invited our attention

to the views already expressed by the Principal Bench in order

dated 08.03.2019 in Writ Petition No. 8264 of 2017 ( Nikhil

Suryakant Padalwar Versus State of Maharashtra and others ) and

other companion matters. In those matters, it was contended

that the various Caste Scrutiny Committees though claiming to be

functional, have not been expediting the process of issuance or

refusing the caste validity certificates.

3. This Court, in the said order, recorded the statements made

in the affidavit as undertakings rendered by the State Government

given to the Court that they were in process to form two Satellite

Committees at Dhule and Kinwat to reduce the burden of existing

committees of Nandurbar and Aurangabad, respectively. All the

necessary infrastructure facilities including staff would be made

available to these Satellite Committees to function smoothly. It

was stated in the affidavit that these two Satellite Committees

would be formed within a period of four weeks. The State

Government also stated that it would establish other six (6)

committees by following the due process so as to reduce the

pendency of matters with all the Committees. It was further

stated that, the Committees would be manned through the

process of transfer, new recruitment and deputation. Members

3 24-PIL-71-21.odt

would be deputed from other departments on deputation for the

fixed period of two years. There would be arrangement of

contractual personnel as per requirement. The committees would

be given target to dispose all the pending matters in time bound

manner within one year's time.

4. This Court, in the said Judgment, recorded assurance given

by the learned Government Pleader that the Department would

now gear up and would create additional Committees at Dhule and

Kinwat. If the law provides and permits for creation of additional

Committees in one District, then that possibility must be explored.

This Court noticed that Pune and Thane are over burdened.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners also invited our attention

to the order dated 17.12.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Petition

10753 of 2018 (Varsharani Ramkrishna Wagh Versus State of

Maharashtra and others) dealing with the similar issue of shortage

of caste scrutiny committees. This Court recorded that the State

Government had ensured that some vacancies which were vacant

would be filled in. In paragraph no. 12 of the said order it is

recorded that, in every District there is committee to scrutinize the

claims of Scheduled Castes and Other Backward Classes. This

position may not be comparable because Tribal population is lesser

than that of the Scheduled Castes and Other Backward Classes,

4 24-PIL-71-21.odt

but still there is a sizable Tribal population in Thane, Nashik,

Dhule, Nandurbar Districts, apart from Jalgaon, Pune and Raigad.

Therefore, there is scope for increasing the number of

committees. In fact, for entire Khandesh Region there cannot be

only one committee at Nandurbar. This Court expressed

displeasure in view of the Government not informing to the Court

till date, as to why an additional committee cannot be set up at

Dhule so that Nandurbar Committee is not over burdened.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the parties invited our

attention to the cabinet decision approving appointment of

additional committees and appointment of 140 staff members with

approval of finance department. Various steps have been taken

pursuant to the said Cabinet decision. It is submitted that,

however, suddenly the Cabinet Minister concerning with the

subject over looked the decision taken by the cabinet and the

State Government and decided to change the name and

headquarters of newly constituted Committees such as Dhule,

Chandrapur and Gondia and same to be remained at Dhule as

Nandurbar and naming them as Nandurbar-2, Gadchiroli-2 and

Nagpur-2, respectively.

7. In view of these submissions made by the learned counsel

for the petitioners, learned A.G.P. invited our attention to the

5 24-PIL-71-21.odt

affidavit in reply filed by the State Government on 07.01.2022 in

these two public interest litigations and more particularly to

paragraphs no. 8 and 9, and submits that, presently there is

shortage of manpower in the Government and due to Covid-19

pandemic situation there were also difficulties in recruitment for

newly created posts, therefore by keeping both the committees at

one place, it will facilitate the work of both the existing Nandurbar

Committee and the newly formed Nandurbar-2 Committee.

In paragraph no. 9 of the said affidavit it is submitted that, the

Government of Maharashtra has taken decision of establishment of

Dhule Committee with the approval of Cabinet initially. However,

in view of outbreak of corona virus, the Government of

Maharashtra vide Government Resolution dated 20.05.2021, has

changed the name and headquarters of Dhule Committee at

Nandurbar as Nandurbar-2 committee. However, the said decision

is being put up for post facto cabinet approval.

8. The learned A.G.P. states that the State Government has

never refused to create and appoint the Caste Scrutiny Committee

and additional committee for Dhule District on the ground of lack

of funds. According to learned A.G.P., the arrangement could not

be made because of shortage of manpower and due to Covid-19

pandemic situation.

6 24-PIL-71-21.odt

9. The learned A.G.P. seeks time to make a statement whether

the decision taken by the Cabinet Minister has been placed before

the Cabinet of the State Government for establishment of Dhule

committee which was taken earlier, or not for approval.

10. Learned A.G.P. did not dispute that the decision was taken to

establish additional Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committees at

Palghar, Nashik, Dhule, Kinwat, Yawatmal, Gondia and

Chandrapur. Pursuant to the cabinet decision, Government

Resolution was also issued on 13.09.2019 taking a decision to

establish the additional separate Caste Scrutiny Committees at the

aforesaid places and the same were already established at the

said places, some time in the month of January-2022 and is in

operation till date.

11. After considering the decision passed by this Court,

representations were filed pointing out the difficulties faced by the

large number of stakeholders including students in not processing

the Caste Claims by the committees expeditiously as per

assurance and undertaking given before the Principal Bench and

after considering the decision taken by the Cabinet for formation

of separate committee for Dhule. We are of the prima facie view

that the learned Minister could not have taken decision thereby

directly or indirectly overruling the decision of the State

7 24-PIL-71-21.odt

Government for formation of several committees and for

appointment of staffs with consent of the Finance department.

12. Be that as it may, even if we accept the statements made in

the affidavit in reply filed by the State Government that the

decision of the Cabinet Minister was by way of arrangement due to

shortage of manpower in the government and due to Covid-19

pandemic situation, the fact remains that such decision taken by

the learned Minister thereby totally giving go by to the decision

already taken by the Cabinet for entire State of Maharashtra,

cannot stand in the eyes of law.

13. We, accordingly, direct the State Government to take steps

to set up the committee in terms of the decision taken by the

Cabinet and take appropriate decision in accordance with the

statement made and undertaking given by the State Government

not later than six weeks from today.

14. We have noticed that a large number of students and other

stakeholders are required to approach this High Court for

appropriate orders and direction against caste scrutiny committees

to dispose off caste claim expeditiously and are seriously

prejudiced in view of shortage of caste scrutiny committees for

disposing the caste claims.

                                             8                               24-PIL-71-21.odt



15.     The      State         Government       shall   take    appropriate          action

immediately for setting up additional committees in compliance of

the decision by the learned Cabinet Minister.

16. In the meanwhile, we direct the State Government to set up

a temporary committee for Dhule district at the convenient

location in the Dhule district, within a period of three weeks from

today and shall appoint requisite staff and committee members so

as to make committee operational till the decision taken by the

Cabinet for formation of several committees is implemented.

17. Place the matter on board under the caption of "direction"

on 13th June 2022.

18. The parties shall act on the authenticated copy of this order.

19. The learned A. G. P. agrees to communicate this order to the

respondents - State for necessary information and compliance.

        ( S. G. MEHARE )                                 ( R. D. DHANUKA )
              JUDGE                                              JUDGE



rrd





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter