Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13987 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2021
1/3 Judg.13.wp.6353.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 6353 OF 2019
Subhash Kashinath Shende
Aged about 45 Years, Occupation - Ex
teacher; 45 A, Chaitanya Apartments,
Beside Agrasen Bhavan, Ravi Bhavan,
Nagpur - 440 010. ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. The Additional Secretary,
School Education & Sports Department,
Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya,
Mumbai - 4000032.
2. Director of Education
(Secondary & Higher Secondary)
Directorate of Education, Central
Building, Pune - 400 001.
3. Commissioner (Education)
Commissionerate of Education
Central Building, Pune - 400 001.
4. Chief Executive Officer
Zilla Parishad, Nagpur.
5. Dy. Director of Education
Secondary & Higher Secondary
Nagpur Division, Nagpur.
::: Uploaded on - 29/09/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 30/09/2021 02:19:50 :::
2/3 Judg.13.wp.6353.2019
6. Education Officer (Secondary)
Zilla Parishad, Nagpur.
7. Head Master/Secretary
Itwari High School, run by Itwari
Education Sanstha, Nagpur.
8. Head Master/Secretary
Vikas Vidyalaya, Wadner, Hinganghat,
District Wardha. ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. S. O. Ahmed, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. A. A. Madiwale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 5 & 6.
Mr. S. N. Gaikwad, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
Mr. K. K. Nalamwar, Advocate for Respondent No.7.
Mr. V. K. Paliwal, Advocate for Respondent No.8.
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE &
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2021. ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.] . Heard Mr. Ahmed, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr.
Madiwale, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 5 & 6, Mr. Gaikwad,
learned Counsel for Respondent No.4, Mr. Nalamwar, learned Counsel
for Respondent No.7 and Mr. Paliwal, learned Counsel for Respondent
No.8. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of
3/3 Judg.13.wp.6353.2019
learned Counsel for the rival parties.
2. Mr. Nalamwar, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.7
states, on instructions, that the Respondent No.7 - School will allow
the Petitioner to join the school in pursuance of the order dated
23/9/2021, issued by the Respondent No.6 and would submit name of
the junior most teacher, who could be absorbed in some other school,
as per the directions given by the Respondent No.6. The statement is
accepted.
3. In view of above, we find that this Petition has served its
purpose, and therefore, it is disposed of in terms of the said order
dated 23/9/2021 and the statement made on behalf of Respondent
No.7 which has been accepted by this Court. Rule accordingly. No costs.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Yadav VG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!