Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13830 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2021
3-TS-51-2001-IN-TP-604-2000.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 51 OF 2001
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 604 OF 2000
Prakashkumar M Shah ...Plaintiff
Versus
Sunita Anant Mehta ...Defendant
Ms Sapana Krishnappa, for the Plaintiff.
Mr Bhavin Gada, w ith Vaishalil Sharma, i/b Harakchand & Co, for
the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J
DATED: 24th September 2021
PC:-
1.
I am told that Mr Kini for the Plaintiff is unwell. This constant delay will not work.
2. The Plaintiff seeking probate has not led the evidence of attesting witness nor any person present at the time of execution of Digitally signed by the Will. The evidence was completed and there is an order of 8th SHEPHALI SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE April 2019 to that effect. The only evidence that the Plaintiff lead is SANJAY MORMARE Date:
2021.09.27 that of the probate Petitioner who is propounding Will, who is 11:06:24 +0530 admittedly not an attesting witness nor was present at the time of
24th September 2021 3-TS-51-2001-IN-TP-604-2000.DOC
execution of the Will. Prima facie, the Plaintiff has not led evidence in accordance with Sections 68 and 69 of the Indian Evidence Act.
3. For these reasons, list the matter for a judgment and final order on 1st October 2021 at 2.30 pm.
4. I am making it clear that on 1st October 2021 the matter will not be adjourned under any circumstances at the instance of either of the parties.
5. All concerned will act on production of a digitally signed copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
24th September 2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!