Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Pooja Samir Tambe And Anr vs Union Of India Through The General ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 13387 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13387 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2021

Bombay High Court
Smt. Pooja Samir Tambe And Anr vs Union Of India Through The General ... on 18 September, 2021
Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar
                                                      30- CAF 1782 of 2016



                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                          CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1782 OF 2016
                                          IN
                         FIRST APPEAL (ST) No. 34164 OF 2015

       Smt. Pooja Samir Tambe and Anr.                         ...Applicants
             Vs.
       Union of India,
       Through the General Manager                             ...Respondent

                                ***********
       Mr. Shrishailya Deshmukh for Applicants
       None for the Respondent
                               ************

                                   CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.
                                   DATE    :   SEPTEMBER 18, 2021
       P.C. :

1. Heard Mr. Shrishailya Deshmukh, learned Advocate for the Applicants. None appears for the Respondent although duly served.

2. This civil application is taken out for condonation of delay of 91 days in filing the appeal. The Applicants have filed appeal challenging the judgment and order passed by the Member (Technical) of Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai. The impugned order is dated 23rd March, 2015. The appeal is filed on 9th December, 2015.

3. The contentions in the civil application shows that due to severe financial constraints, delay occurred in filing the appeal. The delay is adequately explained in the application. Although

V.A. Tikam 1/2

30- CAF 1782 of 2016

the Respondents are served, there is no reply filed to the delay condonation application, nor the Respondents are appearing in the matter. Therefore, the averments in the Civil Application have remained uncontroverted.

4. Thus, for the reasons set out in the civil application, Civil Application NO. 1782 of 2016 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.


                                                     (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)


V A Tikam




                   V.A. Tikam                                                                  2/2





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter