Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13293 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2021
1 982-wp 10227-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10227 OF 2021
Yogeshri Bharat Totawar .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr. Pratap V. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents/State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 16th September, 2021.
PER COURT:-
. Heard Mr. Jadhavar, learned counsel for the petitioner. The
learned counsel submits that the petitioner has completed the period of
Krushi Sevak and now the petitioner is entitled for the payment in the
pay scale of Krushi Sahayyak. The same is not being paid only on the
ground that validity certificate is not submitted.
2. The learned A.G.P. appears for all respondents and submits that
the vigilance is completed. The copy of the vigilance report is served
upon the petitioner. The petitioner failed to file her say to the vigilance
report.
1 of 2
2 982-wp 10227-2021.odt
3. If the petitioner is not cooperating in expeditious disposal of the
proceeding, then the petitioner would not be entitled for equity.
4. The petitioner shall appear before the committee on 21.09.2021
and file her say to the vigilance report. The committee shall thereafter
endeavour to decide the proceeding by 15.12.2021.
5. Depending upon the judgment that would be delivered by the
committee in the validation proceeding, the employer may take further
steps with regard to the pay scale of the petitioner.
6. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
( R. N. LADDHA ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!