Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deenanth Nagari Sahakari Path ... vs Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 16208 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16208 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021

Bombay High Court
Deenanth Nagari Sahakari Path ... vs Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar ... on 23 November, 2021
Bench: G. S. Kulkarni
                                                              3.WP9802_2016.doc

Vidya Amin
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                         WRIT PETITION NO. 9802 OF 2016
                                     WITH
                         WRIT PETITION NO. 9810 OF 2016

         Deenanth Nagari Sahakari Path Sanstha
         Mydt., Sangli, through Managing Director          ... Petitioner
               V/s.
         Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
         Kokurud & Ors.                                    ... Respondents

         Mr. Ranjit Thorat, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Kedar J. Patil i/b. Mr.
         Nilesh Patil for the petitioner.
         Mr. Ashutosh M. Kulkarni a/w. Mr. Akshay Kulkarni for respondent
         nos. 2 to15 and 17 to 21.

                                   CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI, J.
                                     DATE : 23 November, 2021
         P.C.:


         1.      Heard Mr. Thorat, learned senior counsel for the petitioner

         and Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 15 and

         17 to 21.


         2.      The challenge raised in this petition is to an order dated 11

         April, 2016 passed by the Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate

         Court (Mumbai) Bench, Pune in Appeal No. 161 of 2014 and

         Appeal No. 162 of 2014 which were disposed of in terms of the

         following order:

                                            ORDER

"1) The Appeal bearing No. 161 of 2014 and Appeal bearing No. 162 of 2014 is hereby allowed subject cost of Rs.5,000/- by each

3.WP9802_2016.doc

appellant to the disputant/respondent no. 1 society on or before 27.04.2016.

2) The judgment and award dated 04.01.2013 passed by the ld. Trial Judge Coop. Court no. 1, Sangli in dispute bearing no. 761 of 2007 is hereby set aside.

3) The matter is remanded back to the ld. Trial Court for afresh hearing.

4) Parties are directed to appear before the Trial Court on 27.04.2016 at 11 a.m.

5) Ld. Trial Judge is hereby directed to see whether the directions given by this Court are complied by the opponents/appellants or not, and after due compliance of the same, take the matter on board and proceed further as per law.

6) If the appellants/opponents failed to comply the order, the disputant/respondent no. 1 is at liberty to execute the award accordingly.

7) The original judgment is to be attached along with Appeal bearing No. 161 of 2014 and the true copy be attached with Appeal No. 162 of 2014.

8) R & P of trial Court be send back to the trial Court immediately."

3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the

Appellate Court has remanded the matter back to the trial Court

for a fresh hearing. These Writ Petitions are filed in May, 2016 and

have remained pending. Perusal of the record indicates that the

disputes pertains to the year 2007, being Dispute No. 761 of 2007,

which was adjudicated and the orders passed thereon were subject

matter of the appeal. The principal proceedings being of the year

2007, in my opinion, it would be appropriate that the parties now

appear before the trial Court and pursue the proceedings before

3.WP9802_2016.doc

the trial Court as remanded by the Appellate Court.

4. The parties at the first instance shall appear before the

Cooperative Court on 29 November, 2021 at 11 a.m. and present

this order before the trial Court. Learned trial Judge in due regard

to the fact that the dispute is of 2007, shall make an endeavour to

decide the dispute as expeditiously as possible and within a period

of six months from 29 November, 2021.

5. All contentions of the parties on merits of the dispute are

expressly kept open.

6. Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. No

costs.



                                                                       (G.S.KULKARNI, J.)

         Digitally signed
         by VIDYA
VIDYA    SURESH AMIN
SURESH   Date:
         2021.11.24
AMIN     19:38:51
         +0530





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter