Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohit S/O Govind Latta And 4 Others vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 8642 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8642 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2021

Bombay High Court
Mohit S/O Govind Latta And 4 Others vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps ... on 30 June, 2021
Bench: V.M. Deshpande, Amit B. Borkar
                                       1                               APL846.20.odt


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 : NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.


           CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 846 OF 2020


 APPLICANTS                    : 1] Mohit S/o Govind Latta,
                                    Aged about 32 years, Occu. Service,
                                    R/o Flat No. 203, Ratan Apartment,
                                    Behind Agyaram Devi Mandir,
                                    Ganesh Peth, Nagpur, Tq. & Dist. Nagpur.

                                 2] Govind S/o Dwarkaprasad Latta,
                                    Aged about 62 years, Occu. Retired,
                                    R/o Opp. Pahadi Mata Mandir, Near
                                    Sakhare Guruji School, Ganeshpeth,
                                    Nagpur, Tq. & Dist. Nagpur.

                                 3] Sau. Saroj W/o Govind Latta,
                                    Aged about 55 years, Occu. Household
                                    R/o Opp. Pahadi Mata Mandir, Near
                                    Sakhare Guruji School, Ganeshpeth,
                                    Nagpur, Tq. & Dist. Nagpur.

                                 4] Monty @ Amit S/o Govind Latta,
                                    Aged about 30 years, Occu. Business,
                                    R/o Opp. Pahadi Mata Mandir, Near
                                    Sakhare Guruji School, Ganeshpeth,
                                    Nagpur, Tq. & Dist. Nagpur.

                                 5] Sau. Yogita W/o Amit Latta,
                                    Aged about 29 years, Occu. Household
                                    R/o Opp. Pahadi Mata Mandir, Near
                                    Sakhare Guruji School, Ganeshpeth,
                                    Nagpur, Tq. & Dist. Nagpur.


                                           VERSUS

 NON-APPLICANT                 : 1] State of Maharashtra,
                                    through Police Station Officer,
                                    Police Station, Ganeshpeth, Nagpur.




::: Uploaded on - 30/06/2021                            ::: Downloaded on - 01/07/2021 06:13:31 :::
                                          2                                      APL846.20.odt


                                2] Sau. Megha W/o Mohit Latta,
                                   Aged 30 years, Occu. Not known,
                                   R/o Sakin, Panvhavati, Kampa Mowa,
                                   Dist. Raipur (CG).

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Mr. V. S. Giramkar, Advocate for the applicants
           Mr. S. S. Doifode, A.P.P. for the non-applicant no.1/State
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 CORAM : V. M. DESHPANDE and AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
                 DATE : JUNE 30, 2021.


 ORAL JUDGMENT [Per V. M. Deshpande, J.]


                  Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

 by consent of the learned counsel for the parties.



 2.               By this application under Section 482 of the Code of

 Criminal Procedure, the applicants are praying for quashment of First

 Information Report registered with Police Station, Ganeshpeth,

 Nagpur vide Crime No. 538/2018 for the offence punishable under

 Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.



 3.               The first information report was lodged by non-applicant

 no.2 against the applicants. Applicant no.1 and non-applicant no.2

 were married with each other on 06.02.2013. Applicant nos.2 and 3




::: Uploaded on - 30/06/2021                                    ::: Downloaded on - 01/07/2021 06:13:31 :::
                                 3                              APL846.20.odt


 are the parents of applicant no.1, whereas non-applicant no.4 is the

 brother of applicant no.1 and applicant no.5 is the wife of applicant

 no.4.



 4.               Notice for final disposal was issued by this Court on

 22.12.2020. The record shows that non-applicant no.2 is served. In

 spite of service when this application was taken up for consideration

 on 16.06.2021, nobody appeared on behalf of non-applicant no.2.

 Therefore, in order to give one chance to the non-applicant no.2, the

 matter was kept today.          Today also nobody appeared for non-

 applicant no.2 nor she has appeared in person.



 5.               We have heard Mr. V.S. Giramkar, learned counsel for the

 applicants and Mr. S.S. Doifode, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

 for the non-applicant no.1/State.



 6.               The submission on behalf of the applicant is that the

 marriage between applicant no.1 and non-applicant no.2 stands

 dissolved by the decree passed by the learned Judge of Family Court

 No.2, Nagpur in Petition No. A-1387/2017 on 05.03.2020. Learned




::: Uploaded on - 30/06/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 01/07/2021 06:13:31 :::
                                  4                              APL846.20.odt


 counsel for the applicants submitted that during pendency of the

 petition for divorce, applicant no.1 and non-applicant no.2 entered

 into a compromise and the said compromise was placed on record

 before the Family Court and thereafter the decree of divorce was

 granted.



 7.               Since, decree of divorce is granted, it appears that non-

 applicant no.2 has lost interest in prosecuting this proceeding. In

 view of the compromise between the applicant no.1 and non-

 applicant no.2 and decree of divorce granted in their favour, whereby

 the relationship as husband and wife has severed, in our view,

 continuance of this proceeding will be nothing but an abuse of

 process of law.



 8.               In that view of the matter, we pass the following order :

                                     ORDER

1. The Criminal Application is allowed.

2. First Information Report registered with Police

Station, Ganeshpeth, Nagpur vide Crime No. 538/2018 for

the offence punishable under Section 498-A read with

5 APL846.20.odt

Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, is hereby quashed and

set aside.

3. Rule is made absolute. The criminal application

is disposed of.

                               JUDGE                      JUDGE

 Diwale





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter