Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7847 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2021
19-AO-4-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.4 OF 2021
WITH CA/3965/2021 IN AO/4/2021
GURUMEETSING ALIAS BITTU DARSHANSING MANDAN
VERSUS
PRANIL BHASKARAN PUTTAMPURE
...
Advocate for Appellant : Shri A. P. Bhandari
...
CORAM : B. U. DEBADWAR, J.
DATE : 14th JUNE, 2021 PER COURT : 1. Heard Shri A. P. Bhandari, learned advocate for appellant.
2. Learned advocate for the appellant seeks permission to
add page No.5A in appeal memo. Leave is granted to add page
No.5A.
3. This appeal from order has been directed against the
judgment and order dated 20-02-2020, passed by the learned
District Judge-6, Dhule, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 140/2017,
whereby judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court in
Regular Civil Suit No. 18/2006, dismissing the suit for eviction and
possession on various statutory grounds, came to be dismissed and
the matter was remanded to the trial Court for fresh hearing, by
1 of 2
19-AO-4-21.odt
giving opportunity to both the sides to lead fresh evidence.
4. Being aggrieved by aforesaid order of remand of the
suit, appellant - original defendant has preferred present appeal.
5. Shri Bhandari, learned advocate while taking me
through the judgment of trial Court and impugned judgment passed
by the first appellate Court demonstrated as to how the impugned
remand order is not within the four corners of Order 41 Rule 23-A
of Code of Civil Procedure. According to him, in the absence of
satisfying reasons for re-trial of the suit, as contemplated in Order
41 Rule 23-A, remand order is not sustainable.
6. In view of the above, issue notice to the respondent,
returnable on 12-07-2021.
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.)
SVH
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!