Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Captain Arun Amrital Sethi vs M.V Som Silver
2021 Latest Caselaw 452 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 452 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Captain Arun Amrital Sethi vs M.V Som Silver on 8 January, 2021
Bench: B.P. Colabawalla
                                                                                    anjali.not on board

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                      O.O.C.J.

Anjali   Digitally signed
         by Anjali T.
                                     JUDGE'S ORDER (L) NO. 714 OF 2021
T.       Aswale

                                                         IN
         Date: 2021.01.08
Aswale   18:06:28 +0530




                            COMMERCIAL ADMIRALTY SUIT (L) NO. 713 OF 2021


                            Captain Arun Amrital Sethi                          ... Plaintiff
                                       v/s
                            m.v som silver, (IMO no. 7522100)                    ...Defendant
                                                         ...................
                            Mr. Shantanu Singh, Advocate for the Plaintiff


                                                                       CORAM: B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.

DATE : 8 January 2021 (In Chamber at 4.30 p.m.) P.C.:

1. Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on board.

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the Plaintiff states that the

Registry has produced the Caveat Register, and there is no caveat

against arrest with respect to the Defendant Vessel. The said

statement is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court.

3. Urgent relief sought is the arrest of Defendant Vessel as there is

an apprehension that Defendant Vessel which is currently at

anjali.not on board

anchorage of the Port of Mumbai, may sail out of the jurisdiction of

this Court. According to the Plaintiff, he has an irrefutable claim

against Defendant Vessel. If Defendant Vessel is permitted to sail,

the Plaintiff will have no legal recourse whatsoever to recover the

amounts due to it and its security will be lost forever and

eventually these proceedings will be rendered infructuous.

4. Briefly, the suit is for judgment and decree against Defendant

Vessel and arrest, sequestration, condemnation and sale of the

Defendant Vessel for securing and/or satisfying the Plaintiff's

aggregate claim of Rs.28,94,000.00 as per the particulars of claim

(Exhibit-I). This claim arises from non-payment of wages to the

Plaintiff in the course of his employment as the Master of the

Defendant vessel from 18 December 2019 to 15 June 2020.

5. I have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Plaintiff and also considered the averments made in the plaint.

Perusing the plaint and the annexures, a prima facie case for

arrest of Defendant Vessel is made out. In the present case, prima

facie, the major claim in the Plaint is a maritime lien and a part is

a Maritime Claim arising out of non-payment of wages to the

anjali.not on board

Plaintiff in the course of his employment on a sister vessel called

M.V.S.SANTU.

6. In these circumstances, I fnd there is no doubt that there is a

cause of action in favour of the Plaintiff and that Defendant Vessel

being at Mumbai anchorage is within the admiralty jurisdiction of

this Court. Plaintiff has made out a prima facie case. The balance

of convenience lies with the Plaintiff to whom, in my view, almost

irreversible prejudice would be caused if reliefs were to be denied.

7. Accordingly, I order and direct the arrest of the Defendant Vessel

M.V Som Silver, (IMO No. 7522100) along with her hull, engine,

tackle, gear, plant, machinery, articles, boats, things, apparel,

equipment, stores and other paraphernalia at present lying in the

Mumbai Port Anchorage within the harbour and port of Mumbai.

8. The Judge's Order for arrest of the Defendant Vessel is also signed

separately.

9. The Plaintiff at liberty to forward a copy of the communication

from the offce of the Sheriff of Mumbai along with a copy of this

anjali.not on board

Order by Fax/email/hand delivery/RPAD to the Port and Customs

authorities.

10. Plaintiff's Advocate undertakes to serve the warrant of arrest on

the Defendant Vessel and other concerned authorities within a

period of six weeks from today. The undertaking is accepted.

11. After service of this order of arrest, if the arrested vessel is not

released by furnishing security or bail amount within 8 weeks of

service or an application for vacating the order of arrest is not

fled or the vessel is found abandoned by the person in-charge of

the vessel or owner or is found unmanned, then, in such an event,

on an application being made by Plaintiff, offce of the Sheriff of

Mumbai shall present a Sheriff's report for auctioning the vessel

within 14 days from the date of receiving communication from the

plaintiff's advocate or from the date of knowledge of abandonment

of vessel.

12. This order shall be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/

Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned shall act on

production by fax or e-mail of a digitally signed copy of this order.

(B. P. COLABAWALLA J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter