Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3412 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021
Judgment
wp5075.17 14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5075 OF 2017
M/s.Shri Sant Gajanan Nagri Sahakari
Patsanstha, Maryadit, Sahakar Nagar, LIC
Office Road, Warud, District Amravati. ..... Petitioner.
:: V E R S U S ::
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Office of Assistant Provident Commissioner,
Sub Regional Office, Akola. ..... Respondent.
===================================
Shri N.R.Saboo, Counsel for the petitioner.
Shri H.N.Verma, Counsel for the respondent.
===================================
CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. On 3.8.2017, notice was issued in this writ petition.
The respondent is duly served. This writ petition is filed seeking
quashment of order dated 16.6.2017 passed under Section 7B and
order dated 22.6.2016 passed under Section 7A of the Employees'
Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short,
.....2/-
::: Uploaded on - 24/02/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 24/02/2021 23:24:20 :::
Judgment
wp5075.17 14
2
"the Act of 1952") by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Sub Regional Office, Akola.
2. After hearing learned counsel Shri N.R.Saboo for the
petitioner and learned counsel Shri H.N.Verma for the respondent,
I am of view that this writ petition can be disposed of at admission
stage itself. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard
finally by consent of learned counsel for parties.
3. The petitioner is a registered society registered under
the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act.
Undisputedly, the petitioner is authorized to function as banking
society. The petitioner is carrying activities of credit cooperative
society. According to the petitioner, the society is having six
employees on its pay roll and the society is also taking assistance
of 15 persons who were appointed as pigmy agents. According to
the petitioner, function of these pigmy agents is to collect daily
saving of persons who are having accounts with the petitioner
society and to deposit daily collection with the petitioner.
.....3/-
::: Uploaded on - 24/02/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 24/02/2021 23:24:20 :::
Judgment
wp5075.17 14
3
According to the petitioner, pigmy agents are not employees of
petitioner society but they are compensated by making payments
as commission.
4. The question, the petitioner is raising, is that whether
these pigmy agents can be treated as employees of the society and
whether provisions of the Act of 1952 can be made applicable or
not.
5. Learned counsel for parties invited my attention to
judgment delivered by this Court (Coram : Manish Pitale, J.) on
25.4.2019 in a bunch of writ petitions (Writ Petition
No.5154/2016 and other connected petitions) and more
particularly to paragraph Nos.21 and 28 of the said judgment.
Perusal of paragraph No.28 shows that this Court (Coram : Manish
Pitale, J.) in view of Division Bench judgment in the case of
Pachora Peoples' Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. Employees Provident
fund Organization, reported at 2014(4) Mh.L.J. 436 remanded
matter back for proper enquiry. It would be useful to reproduce
.....4/-
::: Uploaded on - 24/02/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 24/02/2021 23:24:20 :::
Judgment
wp5075.17 14
4
paragraph No.28 of the said judgment in Writ Petition
No.5154/2016 as under:
"In the light of the above, this Court is of the
opinion that the writ petitions in the present
case deserve to be partly allowed and all the
cases deserve to be remanded to the Provident
Fund Commissioner for undertaking enquiry
under Section 7-A of the Act of 1952, on the
parameters laid down by the Division Bench of
this court in the case of Pachora People's Co-
op. Bank Ltd. vs. Employees Provident Fund
Organization (supra) quoted above, including
on the question of the applicability of the Act
of 1952 to the banks/employers in the present
case as mandated under section 7-A(1)(a) of
the Act of 1952."
6. In this view of the matter, I pass following order:
ORDER
(1) Orders dated 16.6.2017 and 22.6.2016 passed under Section
7B and 7A respectively is hereby quashed and set aside.
(2) The dispute is remanded back to the Assistant Provident Fund
Commissioner, Akola to undertake enquiry under 7A of the 1952
.....5/-
Judgment
wp5075.17 14
Act in the light of parameters laid down by the Division Bench of
this Court in review in the case of Pachora Peoples' Cooperative
Bank Ltd. vs. Employees Provident fund Organization cited supra.
Rule is made absolute in above terms. No costs.
JUDGE
!! BRW !!
...../-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!