Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhimanyu Premlal Patle vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 16716 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16716 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021

Bombay High Court
Abhimanyu Premlal Patle vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. ... on 2 December, 2021
Bench: S.B. Shukre, Anil Laxman Pansare
         47E-WP7662.19-J                                                                          1/3


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 7662 OF                      2019

         PETITIONER:                        Abhimanyu Premlal Patle, Aged about 63
                                            years, Occu-Retired, R/o Vinoba Nagar,
                                            Tumsar, at post Tq. Tumsar, Dist.
                                            Bhandara.

                                              ...VERSUS...

         RESPONDENTS :- 1]                  State of Maharashtra, through its
                                            Secretary, Rural Development and Water
                                            Conservation Department, Mantralaya,
                                            Mumbai-32.

                                    2]      State of Maharashtra, through its
                                            Secretary, School Education and Sports
                                            Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

                                    3]      Divisional    Commissioner,       Nagpur
                                            Division, Nagpur, Tq. and Dist. Nagpur.

                                    4]      Zilla Parishad, Bhandara through its
                                            Chief Executive Officer, Bhandara, Tq.
                                            and Dist. Bhandara.

                                    5]      Education Officer (Primary),                       Zilla
                                            Parishad, Bhandara, Tq. and                        Dist.
                                            Bhandara.


         --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Mr.A.R.Deshpande, counsel for petitioner.
                       Mrs. Ketki Joshi, GP for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
                               None for respondent Nos.4 and 5.
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KHUNTE
          47E-WP7662.19-J                                                     2/3



                                   CORAM : SUNIL B.SHUKRE &
                                           ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATE : 02.12.2021.

ORAL J U D G M E N T (Per: Sunil B.Shukre, J.)

Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

Though respondent Nos.4 and 5 are served, none appears on their

behalf.

3. It is not in dispute that the issue involved in this

petition pertains to the petitioner being District Awardee Teacher

has received the award of excellence for his work in the district

and so is entitled to benefits flowing from such conferment of the

award on him, going by the view taken by this Court in the case of

Sanjay Ramkrushan Waghmare and others v. State of Maharashtra

and others, decided by common judgment rendered on 14 th

February, 2019 in Writ Petition No.5419 of 2018 and others. We

therefore, allow the petition and issue the following directions.

KHUNTE
                                 47E-WP7662.19-J                                                  3/3




                                4.          The    respondent-Zilla   Parishad    after   satisfying

themselves about the petitioner being District Awardee Teacher

having been awarded certificate prior to 4 th September, 2018 shall

consider the case of the petitioner for additional increment as is

laid down under the Government Resolution dated 12th December,

2000. The same shall be considered on merits by considering the

judgments rendered in all the applicable cases as expeditiously as

possible and preferably within a period of six months.

5. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.

(ANIL L. PANSARE, J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J)

KHUNTE Signed By:GHANSHYAM S KHUNTE

Signing Date:03.12.2021 17:09

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter