Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinayak Dhondiram Sonawane vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 6669 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6669 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2021

Bombay High Court
Vinayak Dhondiram Sonawane vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 23 April, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
                                                        19a. IA 1304-21 in APEAL 393-2021.doc


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1304 OF 2021
                                                   IN
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 393 OF 2021


            Vinayak Dhondiram Sonawane                             ...Applicant
                 Versus
            State of Maharashtra and Anr.                          ...Respondents

            Mr. Vatsal Thakkar i/by Mr. Amol Patankar for the Applicant.

            Mr. S.V.Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.

            Mr. H.S.Venegaonkar for the Respondent No.2/CBI.

                                             CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                             DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2021
                                            (Through Video Conferencing)
            P.C. :



            1.              Heard learned Counsel for the parties.



            2.             By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

            sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of

            his appeal.



            3.             The applicant, vide judgment and order dated 26/03/2021

Wakodikar                                                                                          1/3



             ::: Uploaded on - 26/04/2021                     ::: Downloaded on - 08/09/2021 08:39:26 :::
                                                            19a. IA 1304-21 in APEAL 393-2021.doc


             passed by the learned Special Judge for CBI, Greater Bombay in CBI

             Special Case No.2 of 2016, has been convicted and sentenced as under:-

                       -       for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(e) r/w 13(2) of

                       the Prevention of Corruption Act, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for

                       5 years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo further

                       simple imprisonment for 6 months.


             4.                It is not in dispute that the applicant was on bail, pending trial

             and that he has not abused or misused his liberty whilst on bail. The appeal

             has been admitted by a separate order passed today, in the aforesaid appeal.

             The sentence imposed is a short term sentence and the appeal is not likely

             to be heard in the immediate near future.               Even otherwise, arguable

             questions have been raised by the learned Counsel for the applicant.



             5.                Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

             applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the

             hearing and final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and

             conditions :-

                                                     ORDER

i) The applicant be released on cash bail in the sum of

Rs.25,000/-, for a period of eight weeks;

Wakodikar 2/3

19a. IA 1304-21 in APEAL 393-2021.doc

ii) The applicant shall within the said period of eight weeks,

furnish P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, with one or two sureties in

the like amount;

iii) The applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in six months

on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his appeal is finally

disposed of;

iv) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of residence or

mobile details, if any, from time to time;

v) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the

trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High Court and the

prosecution would be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation

of bail.

6. The application is accordingly disposed of.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar                                                                                               3/3




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter