Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7634 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2017
jdk 1 3.cwp.9390.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
W.P. NO. 9390 OF 2015
The Secretary, ]
Mah. Public Service Commission ]
situated at 5½, 7, 8th floor, ]
Cooperage Telephone Corporation ]
building, Maharshi Karve Road, ]
Cooperage, Mumbai ].. Petitioner
Vs.
1. Dharampal Murlidhar Barmase ]
Aged about 54 years, ]
Occ: Service as Technical Asstt. ]
in the office of Dairy ]
Development Commissioner, ]
Khan Abdul Gafar Khan Road, ]
Worli-Seaface, Worli, ]
Mumbai-18 Residing at C/2, ]
Dairy Staff Quarters, ]
Worli, Mumbai-400018 ]
]
2. The State of Maharashtra ]
through the Additional Chief ]
Secretary, Agri., Dairy ]
Development and Fisheries, ]
Department, Mantralaya, ]
Mumbai-400 032 ]
]
3. The Commissioner, ]
Dairy Development, Animal ]
Husbandry and Fisheries ]
Deptt. Khan Abdul Gafar Khan ]
Road, Worli, Mumbai-400018 ].. Respondents
1 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 10/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 10/10/2017 23:38:16 :::
jdk 2 3.cwp.9390.15.doc
....
Mr. Shrikrishna Ganbavale Advocate for Petitioner
Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh Advocate i/b Sharayu Shinde for
Respondent No. 1
Mr. N.C. Walimbe AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
....
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2017
P.C.:
1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the
learned counsel for respondent no.1 and the learned AGP for
the respondent nos. 2 and 3. Rule. By consent, rule is made
returnable forthwith and the matter is heard finally.
2 This petition has been preferred by Maharashtra
Public Service Commission (for short "MPSC" ) against the order
dated 12.2.2015 passed by Maharashtra Administrative
Tribunal, Mumbai in Original Application No. 697 of 2012. By
the said order, the Original Application preferred by Respondent
No.1 came to be allowed. In the Original Application,
Respondent No.1 claimed that his candidature as General
Manager from Scheduled Caste category in the Dairy
Development Department was wrongly rejected by MPSC on the
2 of 3
jdk 3 3.cwp.9390.15.doc
ground that he did not have sufficient experience. As stated
earlier, the Original Application came to be allowed and
Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were directed to
appoint Respondent No.1 as General Manager in Government
Milk Scheme.
3 The State has also challenged the very same order of
Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 12.2.2015 in O.A.
No. 697 of 2012 by preferring Writ Petition No. 11750 of 2016.
The said Writ Petition was allowed by us today. For the
reasons mentioned in the judgment delivered by us today in
Civil Writ Petition No. 11750 of 2017, this petition is also
allowed. Rule is made absolute in above terms.
[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI,J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
kandarkar
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!