Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Prinicipal Milind Junior ... vs Haricharan Amarsing & Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 8920 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8920 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2017

Bombay High Court
The Prinicipal Milind Junior ... vs Haricharan Amarsing & Ors on 21 November, 2017
Bench: R.V. Ghuge
                                                 *1*                           66wp179o03fh


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              WRIT PETITION NO.179 OF 2003 

1         The Principal,
          Milind Junior College,
          Parali Vaijinath, District Beed.

2         Pradnya Education Society,
          Mumbai.
          Through its Secretary/ Chairman
          Anantrao s/o Shankarrao Jagatkar,
          Age 54 years.
          R/o As above.
          Having office at Parali Vaijinath.
                                                   ...PETITIONER

          -VERSUS-

1         Haricharan Amarsing Dhirbasi,
          Age : 27 years,
          Occupation : Service,
          R/o Parali Vaijinath, 
          Taluka Parali Vaijinath,
          District Beed.

2         The Deputy Director of Education,
          Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad.

3         The Presiding Officer,
          School Tribunal, Aurangabad.
          Camp at Solapur.
                                                   ....RESPONDENTS
                                           ...
                     Mrs.Asha S. Rasal, Advocate for the Petitioners.
                     Shri B.A.Shinde, AGP for Respondent 2/ State.
                                           ...

                                       CORAM:  RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATE :- 21st November, 2017

*2* 66wp179o03fh

Oral Judgment :

1 On 25.02.2003, after hearing the Petitioner and Respondent

No.1, this Court admitted the petition and expedited the hearing of Appeal

No.71/2002 pending before the School Tribunal. The statement of

Respondent No.1 was recorded that Respondent No.1/ Employee had

been reinstated in service. The direction to make the payment of 75%

salary during the pendency of the appeal was, therefore, stayed as

Respondent No.1 was already in service and was earning fully salary.

4 Considering the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of with

the observation that if Appeal No.71/2002 is still pending before the

School Tribunal, Solapur, the same shall be decided as expeditiously as

possible and in any case, on or before 30.04.2018.

5 Needless to state, if the same is already decided, the interim

order passed by the Tribunal would, therefore, merge in the final

judgment.

       6                 Rule is discharged.



kps                                                        (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter