Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8740 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2017
1 apl781.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 781 OF 2017
1] Dr. Avinash Govind Sharma,
Aged about 47 years, Occ. Doctor -
Medical Practice, R/o. Plot No.10,
Jayanti Villa-1, Radha Krishna Apartment,
Manish Nagar, Nagpur.
2] Dr. Mrs. Pompy w/o. Avinash Sharma,
aged about 33 years, Occ. Student,
R/o. Plot No.10, Jayanti Villa-1,
Radha Krishna Apartment,
Manish Nagar, Nagpur. ...... APPLICANTS
...VERSUS...
State of Maharashtra,
Through P.I. Sonegaon
Police Station, Nagpur ...... RESPONDENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri P. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for applicant No.1
Smt. Renuka S. Sirpurkar, Advocate for applicant No.2
Shri A.M.Deshpande, APP for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE AND
M.G.GIRATKAR, JJ.
th DATE : 15 NOVEMBER, 2017 .
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per M.G.Giratkar, J.)
Rule made returnable forthwith.
Heard finally by consent of the learned counsels
appearing for the parties.
2] By the present application, both the applicants,
husband and wife, prayed to quash and set aside First
2 apl781.17.odt
Information Report lodged by applicant No.2 against the
applicant No.1 in Police Station Sonegaon and also prayed to
quash and set aside Regular Criminal Case No. 301049 of
2015 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class
Court No.8, Nagpur, instituted by Police Station Sonegaon on
the report of applicant No.2.
3] Today, both the applicants are present before
the Court with their respective counsels. We have heard
both the applicants in person. Both the applicants submitted
that they have settled the matter as per the compromise
taken place before the Mediator. The copy of the settlement
is filed on record at page 74. It is dated 3 rd November, 2017.
As per clause (b) of the said agreement, the applicant no.2
agreed to withdraw the proceedings pending against the
applicant No.1 for the offence punishable under Section
498-A of Indian Penal Code. As per the said agreement, the
applicant No.1 has to deposit Rs.50,00,000/- before the
Family Court, Nagpur. There is no dispute that applicant
No.1 has deposited Rs.50,00,000/- in the Family Court at
Nagpur.
4] As the husband and wife have settled their
3 apl781.17.odt
dispute, the complainant-wife do not want to proceed further,
there will not be any possibility of conviction. Hence, in view
of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Gian
Singh vrs. State of Punjab, reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303,
keeping the matter pending will be abuse of process of Court
and therefore, the application will have to be allowed.
5] In the result, the application is allowed in terms
of prayer clauses (i) and (ii). Regular Criminal Case No.
301049 of 2015 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First
Class Court No.8, Nagpur against the applicant No.1 for the
offence under Sections 498-A, 504, 506(2) and 323 of Indian
Penal Code is hereby quashed and set aside. The applicant
No.2 is at liberty to withdraw the amount of Rs.50,00,000/-
deposited by applicant No.1 in the Family Court, Nagpur.
Rule made absolute in above terms. No order as
to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!