Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jijamata Education Society & Anr vs Sujata Sudhir Gaikwad & Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 2520 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2520 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2017

Bombay High Court
Jijamata Education Society & Anr vs Sujata Sudhir Gaikwad & Ors on 12 May, 2017
Bench: R.V. Ghuge
                                                                WP/5768/1999
                                      1

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                           BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        WRIT PETITION NO. 5768 OF 1999
                                     WITH
                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5320 OF 2001
                                     WITH
                      CONTEMPT PETITION NO.212 OF 2001

 Sujata Sudhir Gaikwad,
 Age 40 years, Occ. Service
 R/o Plot No.3-B, Shivaji Colony,
 Nandurbar.                                       ..Petitioner

 Versus

 1. North Maharashtra University,
 Jalgaon, Through its Registrar.

 2. The Chairman,
 Grievance Committee,
 North Maharashtra University,
 Jalgaon, Through its Registrar.

 3. The Joint Director of Education
 (Higher Education Grants),
 Jalgaon.

 4. Jijamata Education Society,
 Nandurbar, through its Secretary.

 5. Jijamata Education Society's,
 Arts Commerce and Science
 College, Mandur, Dist. Nandurbar
 Through its Principal.

 6. Bhausaheb Vishnu Jadhav
 Age major, Occ. Service
 R/o C/o Jijamata Collage,Nandurbar.              ..Respondents.

                                      ...
                   Advocate for Petitioner : None present.
              AGP for Respondent / State : Shri S.N.Morampalle
              Advocate for Respondents 1 & 2 : Shri Vivek Dhage
               Advocate for Respondents 4 & 5 : Shri K.V.Patil
                            h/f Shri S.R.Barlinge
                                      ...




::: Uploaded on - 15/05/2017                    ::: Downloaded on - 17/05/2017 00:28:10 :::
                                                                  WP/5768/1999
                                        2



                          CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: May 12, 2017 ...

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

1. None appeared for the petitioner on 8.5.2017 and even today

in the Special Vacation Sitting.

2. The only grievance put forth in this petition by the petitioner

is that she should be declared senior to respondent No.6 in the

seniority list maintained by the Arts, Commerce and Science College

- respondent No.5. It is prayed that the declaration of the Grievance

Redressal Committee of respondent No.1 / University dated 7.9.1999

be quashed and set aside.

3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 & 5 / Education

Society, submits that the petitioner has quit her employment with

respondent No.5 / College and has joined the Vidhya Vardhini Sabha's

Arts, Commerce and Science College, Dhule on 30.11.2004 as a Full

Time Lecturer.

4. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 / University submits that

the University has received a letter from the Principal of Vidhya

Vardhini Sabha's Arts, Commerce and Science College, Dhule dated

11.5.2017, stating therein that the petitioner has joined the said

WP/5768/1999

college on 30.11.2004 and her retirement age as a Lecturer, would be

after completing 60 years. A copy of the communication by the

Registrar of the University to the Deputy Registrar of the said

University dated 11.5.2017 indicates that the petitioner would

superannuate at the age of 60 years on 31.3.2019 from the Vidhya

Vardhini Sabha's Arts, Commerce and Science College, Dhule. All

these communications are taken on record and collectively marked

Exhibit "X" for identification.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents and the learned AGP for

respondent No.3 submit that when the issue of seniority between the

petitioner and respondent No.6 was only in relation to the Arts,

Commerce and Science College of respondent No.5, the said dispute

does not survive as the petitioner has already left the service of

respondent / College.

6. Considering the above, I am of the view that as the dispute

between the petitioner and respondent No.6, pertaining to the

seniority, was specifically with relation to respondent No.5 College

and since the petitioner had left the said College about 13 years ago,

this petition is rendered infructuous.

7. In the light of the above and in view of Exhibit "X", this

petition is being disposed off as infructuous. Rule is discharged.

WP/5768/1999

8. Considering the above, I deem it proper to dispose of the

Contempt Petition.

9. Pending Civil Application, if any, stands disposed off.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter