Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 790 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2017
Writ Petition No.7160/2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7160 OF 2015 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16478 OF 2015
Sunil s/o Nivratti Nikhate
Age 32 years, Occ. Nil,
R/o Ashirwad Nagar, Nanded ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Priya w/o Sunil Nikhate
Age 26 years, Occu. Household,
R/o Sumedh Nagar, Taroda (Kd.)
Behind Shiv Parvati Mangal
Karyalaya, Nanded. ... RESPONDENT
.....
Mrs. Maya R. Jamdhade, Advocate for petitioner
Mrs. Ranjana Reddy, Advocate for respondent
.....
CORAM: S. B. SHUKRE, J.
DATED: 16th March, 2017. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard
finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. On going through the impugned order dated
17/12/2014, which takes a prima facie view, on the basis of
Writ Petition No.7160/2015
the material available on record that the petitioner has a
sound financial background and his monthly income is about
Rs.30,000/-, I find that, the view so taken by the learned
Principal Judge of the Family Court cannot be upset by this
Court merely because another view is possible. In exercise of
extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court, substituting the view
of the lower Court, just because another view is possible, is
not permissible. The view taken by the trial Court is not so
illogical or perverse. Therefore, I see no reason to interfere.
The Writ Petition is dismissed with costs. Rule is discharged.
3. In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, Civil
Application stands disposed of.
( S. B. SHUKRE ) JUDGE
fmp/wp7160.15
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!