Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pyarali H. Mavani (Deceased) Thr ... vs Vaishali Magaswargiya Co-Op. ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 441 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 441 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2017

Bombay High Court
Pyarali H. Mavani (Deceased) Thr ... vs Vaishali Magaswargiya Co-Op. ... on 3 March, 2017
Bench: Z.A. Haq
                                       1                                                                wp1265.17

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR


                            WRIT PETITION NO.1265/2017


Pyarali S/o Husenali Mavani (deceased), 
through his legal heirs.
  
1. Sakkarkhannu Pyarali Mavani,
     aged about 64 Yrs., Occu. Housewife, 
     R/o Vaishali Society, Behind Nandurkar 
     College, Yavatmal - 445 001. 

2.   Meena Ameen Dhammani,
     aged about 44 Yrs., Occu. Housewife, 
     R/o Garden Society, Wanjari Fail Road, 
     Yavatmal - 445 001.

3.   Rubina Karim Lalani,
     aged about 42 Yrs., Occu. Housewife, 
     R/o Azad Chowk, At Armori, 
     Distt. Gadchiroli. 

4.   Rozina Raju Virani,
     aged about 40 Yrs., Occu. Housewife, 
     R/o A/3, Salimbad Society, Near
     Sandip Mangalam, Yavatmal - 445 001.

5.   Nargis Asif Hirani,
     aged about 38 Yrs., Occu. Housewife, 
     R/o "Aashish", C/9 Shahid Society, 
     Yavatmal - 445 001.

6.   Salima Altaf Bhiwani,
     aged about 32 Yrs., Occu. Housewife, 
     R/o Basera Colony, G.V. Tower Building, 
     Gadchiroli.

7.   Amin Pyarali Mavani,
     aged about 28 Yrs., Occu. Service, 
     R/o Vaishali Society, Behind Nandurkar 
     College, Yavatmal - 445 001.


        ::: Uploaded on - 17/03/2017                                 ::: Downloaded on - 27/08/2017 18:41:56 :::
                                                                                   2                                                                wp1265.17

            Presently residing at Saint Antonio USA

            All the petitioners are being represented 
            through their Special Power of Attorney
            Holder - Smt. Nargis Asif Hirani - The 
            petitioner No.5.                                                                                                                                   ..Petitioners.

            ..Vs..

Vaishali Magaswargiya Co-operative Housing Society
Ltd., Yavatmal, Reg. No.632, through its President/
Secretary, Vaishali Society, Behind Nandurkar 
College, Yavatmal - 445 001.                                         ..Respondent.
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
           Shri S. O. Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners. 
           Shri S.J. Kadu, Advocate for the respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 


                                                                 CORAM :  Z.A.HAQ, J.
                                                                 DATE  :     3.3.2017.



ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Heard Shri S. O. Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners and Shri S.J.

Kadu, Advocate for the respondent.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3. The learned Advocate for the petitioners has pointed out that the

application (Exh. No.12) filed by the petitioners under Order 41 Rule 27 read

with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure and under Rule 17(2) of the

Maharashtra State Co-operative Tribunal Regulations has not been considered

by the Co-operative Appellate Court and the appeal is decided. It is argued that

3 wp1265.17

another application filed by the petitioners seeking permission to produce

documents is partly allowed, however, the substantive prayer seeking

directions to the Sub-Divisional Officer to produce original / certified copy of

map is not granted. It is submitted that the matter is required to be remanded

for deciding the application (Exh. No.12) and for reconsidering the application

(Exh. No.10). It is submitted that the petitioners are not protracting the

matter and to dispel this impression the petitioners are willing to deposit

Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with the Co-operative Court to show

their bona fides.

Though the learned Advocate for the respondent has opposed the

prayer made on behalf of the petitioners, considering the nature of controversy

and the fact that the application (Exh. No.12) is not considered by the

Co-operative Appellate Court, in my view, the impugned judgment is required

to be set aside and the matter has to be remitted to the Co-operative Appellate

Court for fresh decision. As the matter is being remanded it would be

appropriate that the Co-operative Appellate Court considers the application

(Exh. No.10) afresh.

Hence, the following order:

(i) The impugned judgment passed by the Maharashtra State

Co-operative Appellate Court, Mumbai Bench at Nagpur is set aside.

(ii) The order passed by the Co-operative Appellate Court on 9 th June,

2016 on application (Exh. No.10) is set aside.

                                                           4                                                                wp1265.17

(iii)             The Appeal No.47/2015 is restored.

(iv)              The Co-operative Appellate Court is directed to decide the appeal

afresh after deciding the applications (Exh. Nos.10 and 12).

(v) The petitioners and the representative of respondent shall appear

before the Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court, Mumbai Bench at

Nagpur on 17th April, 2017 at 11 a.m. and abide by further orders in the

matter.

(vi) The Co-operative Appellate Court shall dispose the matter within six

months.

(vii) This order is passed accepting the submission made on behalf of the

petitioners that they will deposit Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with

the Co-operative Appellate Court.

The amount shall be deposited before the Co-operative Appellate

Court till 10th April, 2017.

(viii) If the amount is not deposited till 10 th April, 2017 this order shall

stand recalled and the impugned judgment passed by the Co-operative

Appellate Court shall stand revived.

(ix) The disbursement of the amount which will be deposited by the

petitioners shall be as per the order to be passed by the Co-operative Appellate

Court at the time of disposal of the appeal.

JUDGE

Tambaskar.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter