Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Updesh S/O Champalal Jhawar vs Dharamnarayan S/O ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 2021 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2021 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2017

Bombay High Court
Updesh S/O Champalal Jhawar vs Dharamnarayan S/O ... on 26 April, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                1
                                                          wp2583.17.odt

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
             NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                   Writ Petition No.2583 of 2017


  Updesh s/o Champalal Jhawar,
  Aged about 47 years,
  Occupation - Business,
  Proprietor of M/s. Maheshwari Stores,
  having its shop at Ground Floor,
  Shree Sadan, Plot No.71,
  Central Avenue Road,
  Nagpur.                                          ... Petitioner/
                                                   Ori. Defendant

       Versus

  1. Dharamnarayan s/o Jagdeeshprasad
     Khandelwal,
     Aged 46 years,
     Occupation - Business.

  2. Smt. Rajani w/o Dharamnarayan
     Khandelwal,
     Aged 43 years,
     Occupation - Business.

       Respondent Nos.1 and 2 both
       R/o Shree Sadan, Plot No.71,
       Central Avenue Road,
       Nagpur.                                     ... Respondents/
                                                       Ori. Plaintiffs

  Shri P.S. Tiwari, Advocate for Petitioner.
  Shri R.M. Sharma, Advocate for Respondents.




::: Uploaded on - 26/04/2017                  ::: Downloaded on - 27/04/2017 00:45:35 :::
                                      2
                                                                   wp2583.17.odt

                Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J.

th Dated : 26 April, 2017

Oral Judgment :

1. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by

consent of the learned counsels appearing for the parties.

2. It is not in dispute that on 31-3-2017, there was an

abstention of lawyers in view of the call given by the Bar Council

of Maharashtra and Goa. In view of this, the Trial Court should

not have passed an order on 31-3-2017, closing the case of the

defendant for evidence. The impugned order, therefore, needs to

be set aside.

3. In the result, the petition is allowed. The impugned

order dated 31-3-2017 is hereby quashed and set aside.

It is informed that the matter is fixed before the Trial

Court on 29-4-2017.

The learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant

submits that the petitioner undertakes to conduct the evidence

wp2583.17.odt

and to co-operate with the Trial Court for disposal of the matter.

The Trial Court to decide the matter within a period of

six month from today.

4. Rule is made absolute in above terms. No order as to

costs.

JUDGE.

Lanjewar.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter